Abstract P1069: Health Care Professional Perspectives on IMPLEMENT-HF: A Qualitative Study Examining Successes, Facilitators, and Barriers in a Quality Improvement Program for Patients with Heart Failure

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) leads to over 1 million hospitalizations and 450,000 related deaths annually, yet there are substantial quality gaps in care. In 2021, the American Heart Association launched IMPLEMENT-HF (I-HF), a 3-year national Quality Improvement (QI) initiative, to improve care and outcomes for patients with HF. Several QI strategies were used and evaluated over the course of this initiative. Purpose: Focus groups were conducted to gather health care professional (HCP) perspectives on I-HF implementation. Results will assist in determining overall program impact and to identify successes, barriers, and facilitators to inform implementation of future QI programs. Methods: This study involved virtual focus groups (n=8) with HCPs (n=25) recruited from the 111 sites enrolled in I-HF. A semi-structured focus group guide was developed to facilitate the 60-minute sessions. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed, and inductive and deductive thematic analyses conducted in NVivo identified key high-level themes and subthemes. Results: HCPs felt I-HF improved their care team’s knowledge of HF treatment options and their confidence in treating patients with HF. They reported improvements in prescribing guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), medication adherence, and follow-up appointment attendance during the program period. HCPs appreciated the flexibility and variety of I-HF’s educational offerings, opportunities to learn from other HCPs, and the benefits of the Get With The Guidelines® program on patient care. Commonly cited implementation barriers included high staff turnover, clinical roles taking precedence, and a lack of leadership and organization within their sites, which hindered full engagement with I-HF. The cost of and lack of insurance coverage for GDMT was frequently cited as a major burden for patients and a barrier to uptake. Conclusions: QI programs like I-HF can improve care and outcomes for patients with HF and increase HCP knowledge and confidence in providing appropriate treatments. Several cited implementation facilitators, such as flexible educational offerings, can be replicated in future programs. Some reported barriers, such as limited staff capacity, will be challenging to address. However, future initiatives can offer additional guidance on program implementation and recommend assigning a point person at each site to enhance internal organization and support more comprehensive adoption of program activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.p1069
Primary Topic
Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract P1069: Health Care Professional Perspectives on IMPLEMENT-HF: A Qualitative Study Examining Successes, Facilitators, and Barriers in a Quality Improvement Program for Patients with Heart Failure

Larry Allen, Sruthi Cherkur, Sara Paul, Javed Butler et al.
Circulation
Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
article

Abstract P1069: Health Care Professional Perspectives on IMPLEMENT-HF: A Qualitative Study Examining Successes, Facilitators, and Barriers in a Quality Improvement Program for Patients with Heart Failure

Larry Allen, Sruthi Cherkur, Sara Paul, Javed Butler, JoAnn M. Lindenfeld, Lee R. Goldberg, Ileana L. Piña, Nicole Gonzalez, Lynn Serdynski, M. Kittleson, Nancy K. Sweitzer, Jalisa Powell
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) leads to over 1 million hospitalizations and 450,000 related deaths annually, yet there are substantial quality gaps in care. In 2021, the American Heart Association launched IMPLEMENT-HF (I-HF), a 3-year national Quality Improvement (QI) initiative, to improve care and outcomes for patients with HF. Several QI strategies were used and evaluated over the course of this initiative. Purpose: Focus groups were conducted to gather health care professional (HCP) perspectives on I-HF implementation. Results will assist in determining overall program impact and to identify successes, barriers, and facilitators to inform implementation of future QI programs. Methods: This study involved virtual focus groups (n=8) with HCPs (n=25) recruited from the 111 sites enrolled in I-HF. A semi-structured focus group guide was developed to facilitate the 60-minute sessions. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed, and inductive and deductive thematic analyses conducted in NVivo identified key high-level themes and subthemes. Results: HCPs felt I-HF improved their care team’s knowledge of HF treatment options and their confidence in treating patients with HF. They reported improvements in prescribing guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), medication adherence, and follow-up appointment attendance during the program period. HCPs appreciated the flexibility and variety of I-HF’s educational offerings, opportunities to learn from other HCPs, and the benefits of the Get With The Guidelines® program on patient care. Commonly cited implementation barriers included high staff turnover, clinical roles taking precedence, and a lack of leadership and organization within their sites, which hindered full engagement with I-HF. The cost of and lack of insurance coverage for GDMT was frequently cited as a major burden for patients and a barrier to uptake. Conclusions: QI programs like I-HF can improve care and outcomes for patients with HF and increase HCP knowledge and confidence in providing appropriate treatments. Several cited implementation facilitators, such as flexible educational offerings, can be replicated in future programs. Some reported barriers, such as limited staff capacity, will be challenging to address. However, future initiatives can offer additional guidance on program implementation and recommend assigning a point person at each site to enhance internal organization and support more comprehensive adoption of program activities.

CirculationVol. 151(Suppl_1)
American Heart Association (US), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (US), Catawba Valley Medical Center (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.