Abstract 068: Associations Between Fish Oil Supplement Use or Plasma Omega-3 Levels with Risk for Atrial Fibrillation: The United Kingdom Biobank

Background: Recent observational studies in the UK Biobank (UKBB) concluded that self-reported fish oil supplement (FOS) use is associated with an increased risk for incident atrial fibrillation (AF). This lies in contradiction with a globally representative meta-analysis, which found an inverse relationship between blood levels of omega-3 fatty acids (n-3 FAs) and risk of AF. The extent to which plasma levels of n-3 FAs are related to risk of AF in UKBB has yet to be reported. Objectives: We have leveraged data from the UKBB to 1) determine the relationship between plasma levels of n-3 FAs and incident AF and 2) to further explore the previously reported association between FOS use and incident AF. Methods: Within the UKBB, we identified 266,477 individuals with data on blood plasma n-3 FAs and relevant covariates, and 433,607 individuals with data on self-reported FOS use. The primary outcome was incident AF during the follow-up period (median 12.7y). Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) for FAs were computed continuously (per inter-quintile range [IQ 5 R]) and by quintile (Q). HRs were computed for dichotomous FOS use. Covariates included: age, sex, ethnicity, education, physical exercise, smoking, alcohol use, BMI, use of beta-blocker, drugs for hypertension or cholesterol, prevalent diabetes, CVD or heart failure, and plasma linoleic acid levels. Notably, in our analyses we adjusted for age as a continuous variable to more completely account for age-related risk of AF, compared to previous analyses which adjusted for age as a dichotomous variable (i.e., 65+ vs <65) in their assessment of FOS and risk of AF. Results: Total n-3 levels in blood plasma were inversely associated with incident AF (HR per IQ 5 R = 0.90 [95% CI 0.86, 0.93]), and HR=0.87 (0.83, 0.91) in Q5 (vs Q1). FOS use was reported by 31% of the cohort, with higher use reported in older individuals. After adjusting for age continuously, there was no association between FOS use and risk of AF risk (HR=1.00 [097, 1.02]). Conclusion: In agreement with recent biomarker-based meta-analyses, higher circulating blood levels of n-3 FA were associated with reduced risk for AF in the UKBB. Secondly, this study reassessed the relationship between FOS use and risk of AF in the UKBB, and if age is adjusted for in a continuous fashion, the association between FOS and AF disappears. These findings indicate previous analyses may have insufficiently adjusted for the age-related risk of AF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.068
Primary Topic
Fatty Acid Research and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 068: Associations Between Fish Oil Supplement Use or Plasma Omega-3 Levels with Risk for Atrial Fibrillation: The United Kingdom Biobank

William Franco, James H. O’Keefe, Jason Westra, Nathan Tintle et al.
Circulation
Fatty Acid Research and Health
article

Abstract 068: Associations Between Fish Oil Supplement Use or Plasma Omega-3 Levels with Risk for Atrial Fibrillation: The United Kingdom Biobank

William Franco, James H. O’Keefe, Jason Westra, Nathan Tintle, William H. Harris, Evan L. O’Keefe
article en

Abstract

Background: Recent observational studies in the UK Biobank (UKBB) concluded that self-reported fish oil supplement (FOS) use is associated with an increased risk for incident atrial fibrillation (AF). This lies in contradiction with a globally representative meta-analysis, which found an inverse relationship between blood levels of omega-3 fatty acids (n-3 FAs) and risk of AF. The extent to which plasma levels of n-3 FAs are related to risk of AF in UKBB has yet to be reported. Objectives: We have leveraged data from the UKBB to 1) determine the relationship between plasma levels of n-3 FAs and incident AF and 2) to further explore the previously reported association between FOS use and incident AF. Methods: Within the UKBB, we identified 266,477 individuals with data on blood plasma n-3 FAs and relevant covariates, and 433,607 individuals with data on self-reported FOS use. The primary outcome was incident AF during the follow-up period (median 12.7y). Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) for FAs were computed continuously (per inter-quintile range [IQ 5 R]) and by quintile (Q). HRs were computed for dichotomous FOS use. Covariates included: age, sex, ethnicity, education, physical exercise, smoking, alcohol use, BMI, use of beta-blocker, drugs for hypertension or cholesterol, prevalent diabetes, CVD or heart failure, and plasma linoleic acid levels. Notably, in our analyses we adjusted for age as a continuous variable to more completely account for age-related risk of AF, compared to previous analyses which adjusted for age as a dichotomous variable (i.e., 65+ vs <65) in their assessment of FOS and risk of AF. Results: Total n-3 levels in blood plasma were inversely associated with incident AF (HR per IQ 5 R = 0.90 [95% CI 0.86, 0.93]), and HR=0.87 (0.83, 0.91) in Q5 (vs Q1). FOS use was reported by 31% of the cohort, with higher use reported in older individuals. After adjusting for age continuously, there was no association between FOS use and risk of AF risk (HR=1.00 [097, 1.02]). Conclusion: In agreement with recent biomarker-based meta-analyses, higher circulating blood levels of n-3 FA were associated with reduced risk for AF in the UKBB. Secondly, this study reassessed the relationship between FOS use and risk of AF in the UKBB, and if age is adjusted for in a continuous fashion, the association between FOS and AF disappears. These findings indicate previous analyses may have insufficiently adjusted for the age-related risk of AF.

CirculationVol. 151(Suppl_1)
Saint Luke's Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Fatty Acid Research and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.