Funding Cut for the Humanities in Neoliberal Higher Education Systems: A Case of New Zealand’s Marsden Fund

Abstract As a common trend in neoliberal higher education systems, the New Zealand government recently announced that it would remove the social sciences and humanities from the Marsden Fund in 2025 to support STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) more in order to rebuild the economy. The decision has sparked a range of reactions from various sectors, which generally ask that the government reconsider its decision. I draw from the public reactions and interviews with 26 academics and senior academic research administrators to argue that the impact of government funding cuts for humanities and social sciences on society may be huge if the New Zealand government does not reconsider its decision. The STEM subjects are undoubtedly crucial for the economic growth of a country. However, measuring success by mainly economic contributions may be disastrous because there is much more to success than just attaining economic targets. The humanities and social sciences also contribute to the knowledge economy by teaching society about democracy, philosophy of science, ethics and values that allow peaceful co-existence and make a country prosperous. Therefore, investment in one should not lead to the neglect of the other.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-025-00388-0
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Funding Cut for the Humanities in Neoliberal Higher Education Systems: A Case of New Zealand’s Marsden Fund

Joshua Sarpong
4 citations
New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies
Higher Education Governance and Development
34.09
article

Funding Cut for the Humanities in Neoliberal Higher Education Systems: A Case of New Zealand’s Marsden Fund

Joshua Sarpong
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract As a common trend in neoliberal higher education systems, the New Zealand government recently announced that it would remove the social sciences and humanities from the Marsden Fund in 2025 to support STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) more in order to rebuild the economy. The decision has sparked a range of reactions from various sectors, which generally ask that the government reconsider its decision. I draw from the public reactions and interviews with 26 academics and senior academic research administrators to argue that the impact of government funding cuts for humanities and social sciences on society may be huge if the New Zealand government does not reconsider its decision. The STEM subjects are undoubtedly crucial for the economic growth of a country. However, measuring success by mainly economic contributions may be disastrous because there is much more to success than just attaining economic targets. The humanities and social sciences also contribute to the knowledge economy by teaching society about democracy, philosophy of science, ethics and values that allow peaceful co-existence and make a country prosperous. Therefore, investment in one should not lead to the neglect of the other.

New Zealand Journal of Educational StudiesVol. 60(1)
University of Auckland (NZ)
University of Auckland
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Higher Education Governance and Development
34.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.