Defining Fidelity in the Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education (CASE)

The purpose of the study was to explore the definition of fidelity in the delivery of the Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education (CASE). The conceptual framework utilized in this study was the key domains affecting curriculum fidelity. This framework has four parts focusing on (1) school context, (2) curriculum implementation systems, (3) curriculum implementers, and (4) audiences targeted. To address the research objectives of this study, a basic qualitative approach was used. Each participant represented a different state and were made up of teacher educators, high school educators, and state leaders for agricultural education. The participants were or previously had been high school agricultural educators. Several benefits of the CASE curriculum were identified by the participants of this study. The benefits identified included inquiry-based learning, resources for educators, and assistance for beginning or novice educators. Participants believed the curriculum was beneficial to agricultural educators no matter if they were beginning their careers or are established professionals. Future research should focus on how the lead teachers view the delivery of the CASE curriculum and to what level the curriculum needs to be delivered to reach teaching it with fidelity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agricultural Education
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v66i2.93
Primary Topic
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining Fidelity in the Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education (CASE)

Mark S. Hainline, Scott Smalley, Joe Ramstad
Journal of Agricultural Education
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
article

Defining Fidelity in the Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education (CASE)

Mark S. Hainline, Scott Smalley, Joe Ramstad
article en

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to explore the definition of fidelity in the delivery of the Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education (CASE). The conceptual framework utilized in this study was the key domains affecting curriculum fidelity. This framework has four parts focusing on (1) school context, (2) curriculum implementation systems, (3) curriculum implementers, and (4) audiences targeted. To address the research objectives of this study, a basic qualitative approach was used. Each participant represented a different state and were made up of teacher educators, high school educators, and state leaders for agricultural education. The participants were or previously had been high school agricultural educators. Several benefits of the CASE curriculum were identified by the participants of this study. The benefits identified included inquiry-based learning, resources for educators, and assistance for beginning or novice educators. Participants believed the curriculum was beneficial to agricultural educators no matter if they were beginning their careers or are established professionals. Future research should focus on how the lead teachers view the delivery of the CASE curriculum and to what level the curriculum needs to be delivered to reach teaching it with fidelity.

Journal of Agricultural EducationVol. 66(2)
Iowa State University (US), Sam Houston State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Defining Fidelity in the Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education (CASE) — Mark S. Hainline, Scott Smalley, et al. · Journal of Agricultural Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS