Abstract 053: Menopausal Status and Race/Ethnicity on the Association of Lipoprotein(a) with CAD

Overview: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a risk factor for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD). Little is known about menopausal status and hormone therapy in racial/ethnic-specific associations of elevated Lp(a) with CAD. We investigated this in an age- and racially-diverse cohort of women from the U.S.’s largest integrated healthcare system. Methods: We extracted structured cross-sectional electronic health record data for 2831 women with a laboratory result for Lp(a) between 1999-2023 in the Veterans Health Administration. We designated menopausal status (pre, surgical, natural), use of hormone contraception or menopausal hormone therapy (HT), and history of CAD as of the Lp(a) test date. Elevated Lp(a) was Lp(a) >125 nmol/L. Using multivariate logistic regression with correction for multiple comparisons, we estimated association of elevated Lp(a) with prevalent CAD adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, menopausal status, and HT. Within menopausal subgroups, we conducted analogous multivariate logistic regressions. We tested for interaction between Lp(a) and menopausal status and between HT and race/ethnicity. Results: Elevated Lp(a) was associated with prevalent CAD among all women (OR=1.5, 95% CI [1.2, 1.9], p<0.002). In subgroup analysis by menopause status, elevated Lp(a) was associated with prevalent CAD only for women over 60 with natural menopause (OR=2.1, 95% CI [1.5, 3.0], p<0.001). An interaction model between elevated Lp(a) and menopause status on prevalent CAD was assessed with premenopausal women under 60 without elevated Lp(a) as the reference group. Premenopausal women under 60 with elevated Lp(a) had an OR of 1.4 (95% CI [0.8, 2.5] p=0.274). Women over 60 with natural menopause and without elevated Lp(a) had an OR of 4.9 (95% CI [3.4, 7.3], p<0.001). Women over 60 with natural menopause and elevated Lp(a) had the highest OR of 10.4 (95% CI [6.7, 16.0], p<0.001). Relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) of 5.1 (95% CI [2.2, 9.7]) supports an additive interaction of menopausal status over/under age 60 with Lp(a) on risk of prevalent CAD. The p-value for multiplicative interaction was 0.22. In smaller-sized menopausal subgroups, no observations were observed between race/ethnicity and HT on risk of elevated Lp(a) or on prevalent CAD. Conclusions: Menopausal status over age 60 and elevated Lp(a) (>125 nmol/L) interacted to modify the risk of prevalent CAD. HT use as a possible effect modifier, by race/ethnicity, warrants further exploration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.053
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 053: Menopausal Status and Race/Ethnicity on the Association of Lipoprotein(a) with CAD

Natalie Fullenkamp, Jennifer Lee, Shriram Nallamshetty, Kent Heberer et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 053: Menopausal Status and Race/Ethnicity on the Association of Lipoprotein(a) with CAD

Natalie Fullenkamp, Jennifer Lee, Shriram Nallamshetty, Kent Heberer, Steven Cogill, Mei‐Chiung Shih, Anika Seshadri
article en

Abstract

Overview: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a risk factor for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD). Little is known about menopausal status and hormone therapy in racial/ethnic-specific associations of elevated Lp(a) with CAD. We investigated this in an age- and racially-diverse cohort of women from the U.S.’s largest integrated healthcare system. Methods: We extracted structured cross-sectional electronic health record data for 2831 women with a laboratory result for Lp(a) between 1999-2023 in the Veterans Health Administration. We designated menopausal status (pre, surgical, natural), use of hormone contraception or menopausal hormone therapy (HT), and history of CAD as of the Lp(a) test date. Elevated Lp(a) was Lp(a) >125 nmol/L. Using multivariate logistic regression with correction for multiple comparisons, we estimated association of elevated Lp(a) with prevalent CAD adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, menopausal status, and HT. Within menopausal subgroups, we conducted analogous multivariate logistic regressions. We tested for interaction between Lp(a) and menopausal status and between HT and race/ethnicity. Results: Elevated Lp(a) was associated with prevalent CAD among all women (OR=1.5, 95% CI [1.2, 1.9], p<0.002). In subgroup analysis by menopause status, elevated Lp(a) was associated with prevalent CAD only for women over 60 with natural menopause (OR=2.1, 95% CI [1.5, 3.0], p<0.001). An interaction model between elevated Lp(a) and menopause status on prevalent CAD was assessed with premenopausal women under 60 without elevated Lp(a) as the reference group. Premenopausal women under 60 with elevated Lp(a) had an OR of 1.4 (95% CI [0.8, 2.5] p=0.274). Women over 60 with natural menopause and without elevated Lp(a) had an OR of 4.9 (95% CI [3.4, 7.3], p<0.001). Women over 60 with natural menopause and elevated Lp(a) had the highest OR of 10.4 (95% CI [6.7, 16.0], p<0.001). Relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) of 5.1 (95% CI [2.2, 9.7]) supports an additive interaction of menopausal status over/under age 60 with Lp(a) on risk of prevalent CAD. The p-value for multiplicative interaction was 0.22. In smaller-sized menopausal subgroups, no observations were observed between race/ethnicity and HT on risk of elevated Lp(a) or on prevalent CAD. Conclusions: Menopausal status over age 60 and elevated Lp(a) (>125 nmol/L) interacted to modify the risk of prevalent CAD. HT use as a possible effect modifier, by race/ethnicity, warrants further exploration.

CirculationVol. 151(Suppl_1)
University of Southern California (US), VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US), The Coordinating Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.