Towards edge processing of images from insect camera traps

Abstract Insects represent nearly half of all known multicellular species, but knowledge about them lags behind for most vertebrate species. In part for this reason, they are often neglected in biodiversity conservation policies and practice. Computer vision tools, such as insect camera traps, for automated monitoring have the potential to revolutionize insect study and conservation. To further advance insect camera trapping and the analysis of their image data, effective image processing pipelines are needed. In this paper, we present a flexible and fast processing pipeline designed to analyse these recordings by detecting, tracking and classifying nocturnal insects in a broad taxonomy of 15 insect classes and resolution of individual moth species. A classifier with anomaly detection is proposed to filter dark, blurred or partially visible insects that will be uncertain to classify correctly. A simple track‐by‐detection algorithm is proposed to track classified insects by incorporating feature embeddings, distance and area cost. We evaluated the computational speed and power performance of different edge computing devices (Raspberry Pi's and NVIDIA Jetson Nano) and compared various time‐lapse (TL) strategies with tracking. The minimum difference of detections was found for 2‐min TL intervals compared to tracking with 0.5 frames per second; however, for insects with fewer than one detection per night, the Pearson correlation decreases. Shifting from tracking to TL monitoring would reduce the number of recorded images and would allow for edge processing of images in real‐time on a camera trap with Raspberry Pi. The Jetson Nano is the most energy‐efficient solution, capable of real‐time tracking at nearly 0.5 fps. Our processing pipeline was applied to more than 5.7 million images recorded at 0.5 frames per second from 12 light camera traps during two full seasons located in diverse habitats, including bogs, heaths and forests. Our results thus show the scalability of insect camera traps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.70007
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards edge processing of images from insect camera traps

Henrik Karstoft, Toke T. Høye, Kim Bjerge
3 citations
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Smart Agriculture and AI
5.25
article

Towards edge processing of images from insect camera traps

Henrik Karstoft, Toke T. Høye, Kim Bjerge
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Insects represent nearly half of all known multicellular species, but knowledge about them lags behind for most vertebrate species. In part for this reason, they are often neglected in biodiversity conservation policies and practice. Computer vision tools, such as insect camera traps, for automated monitoring have the potential to revolutionize insect study and conservation. To further advance insect camera trapping and the analysis of their image data, effective image processing pipelines are needed. In this paper, we present a flexible and fast processing pipeline designed to analyse these recordings by detecting, tracking and classifying nocturnal insects in a broad taxonomy of 15 insect classes and resolution of individual moth species. A classifier with anomaly detection is proposed to filter dark, blurred or partially visible insects that will be uncertain to classify correctly. A simple track‐by‐detection algorithm is proposed to track classified insects by incorporating feature embeddings, distance and area cost. We evaluated the computational speed and power performance of different edge computing devices (Raspberry Pi's and NVIDIA Jetson Nano) and compared various time‐lapse (TL) strategies with tracking. The minimum difference of detections was found for 2‐min TL intervals compared to tracking with 0.5 frames per second; however, for insects with fewer than one detection per night, the Pearson correlation decreases. Shifting from tracking to TL monitoring would reduce the number of recorded images and would allow for edge processing of images in real‐time on a camera trap with Raspberry Pi. The Jetson Nano is the most energy‐efficient solution, capable of real‐time tracking at nearly 0.5 fps. Our processing pipeline was applied to more than 5.7 million images recorded at 0.5 frames per second from 12 light camera traps during two full seasons located in diverse habitats, including bogs, heaths and forests. Our results thus show the scalability of insect camera traps.

Remote Sensing in Ecology and ConservationVol. 11(5)
Aarhus University (DK)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Smart Agriculture and AI
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.