EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCING MECHANISMS AND UNIVERSITY RANKING

According to the World Bank, on average 13% of state budget worldwide goes to education, and a significant portion to higher education, and governments are interested in spending these funds productively. One of the generally accepted criteria for the efficiency of a university is its position in international academic rankings. We discuss the influence of the state financing mechanism of universities on their ranking. And what are the main mechanisms of state financing of universities in the world? We identified three main mechanisms: financing according to a formula (a-type), performance-based financing (b-type) and financing by negotiations (c-type). We have collected information about the financing mechanisms of universities in different European countries. Based on the results of the analysis, two main groups of universities were formed: those who do not succeed in ranking (with a- and b-type financing mechanisms), and those who lead in ranking (first hundred). Such universities use a c-type financing mechanism either alongside a- and b-types or as the main one. Based on the results, we propose an effective funding mechanism for the Armenian universities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Finance and Accounting
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59503/29538009-2025.1.15-5
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCING MECHANISMS AND UNIVERSITY RANKING

Astghik Mkhitaryan, Rimantas Želvys
Economics Finance and Accounting
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCING MECHANISMS AND UNIVERSITY RANKING

Astghik Mkhitaryan, Rimantas Želvys
article en

Abstract

According to the World Bank, on average 13% of state budget worldwide goes to education, and a significant portion to higher education, and governments are interested in spending these funds productively. One of the generally accepted criteria for the efficiency of a university is its position in international academic rankings. We discuss the influence of the state financing mechanism of universities on their ranking. And what are the main mechanisms of state financing of universities in the world? We identified three main mechanisms: financing according to a formula (a-type), performance-based financing (b-type) and financing by negotiations (c-type). We have collected information about the financing mechanisms of universities in different European countries. Based on the results of the analysis, two main groups of universities were formed: those who do not succeed in ranking (with a- and b-type financing mechanisms), and those who lead in ranking (first hundred). Such universities use a c-type financing mechanism either alongside a- and b-types or as the main one. Based on the results, we propose an effective funding mechanism for the Armenian universities.

Economics Finance and AccountingVol. 1(15)
Vilnius University (LT), National Academy of Sciences of Armenia (AM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.