Out-of-class review and learner metacognition: Reciprocal effects in a blended learning course

Metacognition plays a crucial role in language learning, enabling learners to reflect on and adjust their strategies for more effective learning, particularly when reviewing for quizzes and exams. Technology can be a powerful aid in this context. This study examines the extent to which review-focused cognitive strategies, delivered using an online blended learning tool, support the metacognition of university-level English learners in Japan. Thirty learners in total participated in the study. They were enrolled in the teacher-researcher’s thirty-week, first-year, compulsory English reading and writing course. The instruments employed were two learner reports, an endof-course questionnaire, learner records from the tool’s database, and the teacherresearcher’s research journal. Findings indicated that: (1) the tool supported learners’ metacognition by raising their awareness of gaps in their English-related linguistic knowledge, aiding their strategic planning for upcoming quizzes and exams, and providing opportunities for learners to explore new cognitive strategies; (2) many learners used their metacognitive skills to maximize their effort and select and use cognitive strategies with intentionality; and (3) the overall assignment had a positive impact on the test-anxiety of many learners. These findings confirm the potential of blended learning tools for fostering out-of-class review behaviors and learners’ metacognitive development. Pedagogical implications are discussed and suggestions for future research are provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v8n1.102555
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Out-of-class review and learner metacognition: Reciprocal effects in a blended learning course

Glen Stewart
Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Out-of-class review and learner metacognition: Reciprocal effects in a blended learning course

Glen Stewart
article en

Abstract

Metacognition plays a crucial role in language learning, enabling learners to reflect on and adjust their strategies for more effective learning, particularly when reviewing for quizzes and exams. Technology can be a powerful aid in this context. This study examines the extent to which review-focused cognitive strategies, delivered using an online blended learning tool, support the metacognition of university-level English learners in Japan. Thirty learners in total participated in the study. They were enrolled in the teacher-researcher’s thirty-week, first-year, compulsory English reading and writing course. The instruments employed were two learner reports, an endof-course questionnaire, learner records from the tool’s database, and the teacherresearcher’s research journal. Findings indicated that: (1) the tool supported learners’ metacognition by raising their awareness of gaps in their English-related linguistic knowledge, aiding their strategic planning for upcoming quizzes and exams, and providing opportunities for learners to explore new cognitive strategies; (2) many learners used their metacognitive skills to maximize their effort and select and use cognitive strategies with intentionality; and (3) the overall assignment had a positive impact on the test-anxiety of many learners. These findings confirm the potential of blended learning tools for fostering out-of-class review behaviors and learners’ metacognitive development. Pedagogical implications are discussed and suggestions for future research are provided.

Australian Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 8(1)
Bunkyo University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.