Opportunities, Challenges, and Regulatory Responses to China’s AI Computing Power Development under DeepSeek’s Changing Landscape

Abstract DeepSeek marks a significant advancement in artificial intelligence (AI), ushering in a new phase of development that is reshaping the global AI landscape. AI progress has relied on the assumption that increasing computing power drives better outcomes. Yet, this focus has yielded diminishing returns, amplifying problems like market monopolies and unaddressed risks. By making its model freely available through open-sourcing, DeepSeek revitalizes the market and uses techniques like model distillation to ensure broader access to computing resources. For China, DeepSeek offers a strategic chance to close the gap with global AI leaders. However, efficiency gains in DeepSeek’s design unexpectedly increase computing demand – a phenomenon known as the Jevons paradox. Meanwhile, China grapples with limited computing resources, heightened security concerns, and stricter U.S. chip export restrictions. These difficulties underscore a deeper tension between current infrastructure and fast-evolving technology. Given computing power’s dual role, alongside China’s industrial needs and global competitive dynamics, regulation should prioritize enabling growth. This facilitative regulatory framework demands dynamic demarcation between public and private spheres in computing infrastructure governance. It also calls for advancing standardization, securing the entire supply chain, and adopting adaptable governance models. Globally, computing power governance is shifting toward “competitive cooperation,” where nations collaborate amid rivalry. China can lead by pushing for international standards, contributing its expertise to a secure, stable, and mutually beneficial global computing ecosystem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Digital Law and Governance
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdlg-2025-0002
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opportunities, Challenges, and Regulatory Responses to China’s AI Computing Power Development under DeepSeek’s Changing Landscape

Ming Hu, Tao Hong
2 citations
International Journal of Digital Law and Governance
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

Opportunities, Challenges, and Regulatory Responses to China’s AI Computing Power Development under DeepSeek’s Changing Landscape

Ming Hu, Tao Hong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract DeepSeek marks a significant advancement in artificial intelligence (AI), ushering in a new phase of development that is reshaping the global AI landscape. AI progress has relied on the assumption that increasing computing power drives better outcomes. Yet, this focus has yielded diminishing returns, amplifying problems like market monopolies and unaddressed risks. By making its model freely available through open-sourcing, DeepSeek revitalizes the market and uses techniques like model distillation to ensure broader access to computing resources. For China, DeepSeek offers a strategic chance to close the gap with global AI leaders. However, efficiency gains in DeepSeek’s design unexpectedly increase computing demand – a phenomenon known as the Jevons paradox. Meanwhile, China grapples with limited computing resources, heightened security concerns, and stricter U.S. chip export restrictions. These difficulties underscore a deeper tension between current infrastructure and fast-evolving technology. Given computing power’s dual role, alongside China’s industrial needs and global competitive dynamics, regulation should prioritize enabling growth. This facilitative regulatory framework demands dynamic demarcation between public and private spheres in computing infrastructure governance. It also calls for advancing standardization, securing the entire supply chain, and adopting adaptable governance models. Globally, computing power governance is shifting toward “competitive cooperation,” where nations collaborate amid rivalry. China can lead by pushing for international standards, contributing its expertise to a secure, stable, and mutually beneficial global computing ecosystem.

International Journal of Digital Law and GovernanceVol. 2(1)
Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.