ESG/Climate vs conventional indices: Their difference in climate premium

• Green finance (change of capital costs) contributes little to climate change. • We measure climate premiums for MSCI ESG/climate and their parent indices. • The difference (impact) is 2.4 bps on average (significant, but insufficient). • Index themes do not matter, concentration does. Green finance will lower carbon emissions if it increases the capital costs of polluting firms. For this transition, substantial green capital is necessary. Climate Change and ESG indices play an essential role in this regard. They serve as ESG or climate investors’ benchmarks and can guide the required investment flows. However, what is the actual impact of these indices? Our paper shows that popular ESG/climate indices display statistically significant yet economically insufficient changes in capital costs relative to their respective parent indices. Without a sufficient discount on capital costs, these investments will not lead to the hoped-for changes in corporate investment projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Finance research letters
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107436
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ESG/Climate vs conventional indices: Their difference in climate premium

Bernd Scherer, Katja Scherer
1 citations
Finance research letters
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
2.21
article

ESG/Climate vs conventional indices: Their difference in climate premium

Bernd Scherer, Katja Scherer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Green finance (change of capital costs) contributes little to climate change. • We measure climate premiums for MSCI ESG/climate and their parent indices. • The difference (impact) is 2.4 bps on average (significant, but insufficient). • Index themes do not matter, concentration does. Green finance will lower carbon emissions if it increases the capital costs of polluting firms. For this transition, substantial green capital is necessary. Climate Change and ESG indices play an essential role in this regard. They serve as ESG or climate investors’ benchmarks and can guide the required investment flows. However, what is the actual impact of these indices? Our paper shows that popular ESG/climate indices display statistically significant yet economically insufficient changes in capital costs relative to their respective parent indices. Without a sufficient discount on capital costs, these investments will not lead to the hoped-for changes in corporate investment projects.

Finance research lettersVol. 81
TU Dortmund University (DE), Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales du Nord (FR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ESG/Climate vs conventional indices: Their difference in climate premium — Bernd Scherer, Katja Scherer · Finance research letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS