Contexts and Forms of Hate Speech in Nigeria’s 2023 Presidential Election Discourse

Election periods in Nigeria often serve as crucial moments for the manifestation of hate speech. This study examines the contextual triggers and rhetorical strategies used in constructing hate speech during Nigeria’s 2023 presidential election. Using van Dijk’s sociocognitive approach to critical discourse analysis, it examines speeches and comments from political actors and their supporters, published in Punch , Daily Post and on X between January 2022 and May 2023. Six strategies, derogation, stereotyping, dehumanisation, scapegoating, demonisation and polarisation, emerged across four key contexts: ethnic orientation, religious affiliation, political ideology and historical alliance. These strategies reinforce negative stereotypes and undermine social cohesion, highlighting the destructive impact of hate speech on national unity and the need for interventions in political elections. Thus, addressing the prejudices that fuel hate speech is essential to effectively curb and mitigate its impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian and African Studies
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096251332949
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contexts and Forms of Hate Speech in Nigeria’s 2023 Presidential Election Discourse

Olalekan Adepoju, Matthew Alugbin
Journal of Asian and African Studies
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

Contexts and Forms of Hate Speech in Nigeria’s 2023 Presidential Election Discourse

Olalekan Adepoju, Matthew Alugbin
article en

Abstract

Election periods in Nigeria often serve as crucial moments for the manifestation of hate speech. This study examines the contextual triggers and rhetorical strategies used in constructing hate speech during Nigeria’s 2023 presidential election. Using van Dijk’s sociocognitive approach to critical discourse analysis, it examines speeches and comments from political actors and their supporters, published in Punch , Daily Post and on X between January 2022 and May 2023. Six strategies, derogation, stereotyping, dehumanisation, scapegoating, demonisation and polarisation, emerged across four key contexts: ethnic orientation, religious affiliation, political ideology and historical alliance. These strategies reinforce negative stereotypes and undermine social cohesion, highlighting the destructive impact of hate speech on national unity and the need for interventions in political elections. Thus, addressing the prejudices that fuel hate speech is essential to effectively curb and mitigate its impacts.

Journal of Asian and African Studies
College of Staten Island (US), Ambrose Alli University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.