On the Horizon: A Global Multidisciplinary Perspective on Delivering Emerging Therapies for Patients with BCG-Naïve High-Risk NMIBC

Patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are generally treated with transurethral resection of the bladder tumor followed by intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), the current standard of care. However, recurrence or progression is common and may result in patients requiring radical cystectomy. Additionally, BCG continues to be in short supply worldwide. Therefore, there is an unmet need for new therapies that provide durable disease control and maintain quality of life. In the BCG-naïve high-risk NMIBC setting, potential new treatment options are emerging, with several regimens combining intravesical therapy with systemic PD-1 or PD-L1-directed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) currently under investigation in several Phase 3 trials. In routine clinical practice, NMIBC has traditionally been managed almost entirely by urologists. However, the introduction of systemic ICIs would likely require medical oncology expertise to help assess patients' fitness for these therapies and potentially for treatment administration and immune-related adverse event management. While multidisciplinary workflows are common practice for advanced bladder cancer, they would represent a paradigm shift in NMIBC. Based on current experience of managing patients with NMIBC across different countries and healthcare systems from our perspective as urologists, medical oncologists, and nurses, we discuss best practices for the potential integration of emerging therapies such as ICIs into the treatment of BCG-naïve high-risk NMIBC. We emphasize the need for multidisciplinary care, either through formalized multidisciplinary teams or cross-discipline collaborative workflows adapted to local needs, to ensure efficient coordination and sharing of responsibilities. Specialized nurses have the potential to play key roles across multiple aspects of patient care. We also highlight the crucial importance of effective communication across teams, increases in resourcing, and education for healthcare professionals, patients, and caregivers to enable eligible patients with high-risk NMIBC to benefit optimally from the introduction of these potential new treatment options. Supplementary file2 (MP4 407382 kb).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oncology and Therapy
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40487-025-00334-6
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Horizon: A Global Multidisciplinary Perspective on Delivering Emerging Therapies for Patients with BCG-Naïve High-Risk NMIBC

Jennifer Sutton, Viktor Grünwald, Girish S. Kulkarni, Rosemary E. Teresi et al.
2 citations
Oncology and Therapy
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
1.59
article

On the Horizon: A Global Multidisciplinary Perspective on Delivering Emerging Therapies for Patients with BCG-Naïve High-Risk NMIBC

Jennifer Sutton, Viktor Grünwald, Girish S. Kulkarni, Rosemary E. Teresi, Mary Jo Hoyt, Petros D. Grivas, Syed A. Hussain, Enrique Grande, Srikala S. Sridhar, Bernadett Szabados, Félix Guerrero‐Ramos, Tilman Todenhöfer, Anne Wilson, Neal D. Shore, Samantha Strumeier, Julia Brinkmann, Marta Carpintero Miguel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are generally treated with transurethral resection of the bladder tumor followed by intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), the current standard of care. However, recurrence or progression is common and may result in patients requiring radical cystectomy. Additionally, BCG continues to be in short supply worldwide. Therefore, there is an unmet need for new therapies that provide durable disease control and maintain quality of life. In the BCG-naïve high-risk NMIBC setting, potential new treatment options are emerging, with several regimens combining intravesical therapy with systemic PD-1 or PD-L1-directed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) currently under investigation in several Phase 3 trials. In routine clinical practice, NMIBC has traditionally been managed almost entirely by urologists. However, the introduction of systemic ICIs would likely require medical oncology expertise to help assess patients' fitness for these therapies and potentially for treatment administration and immune-related adverse event management. While multidisciplinary workflows are common practice for advanced bladder cancer, they would represent a paradigm shift in NMIBC. Based on current experience of managing patients with NMIBC across different countries and healthcare systems from our perspective as urologists, medical oncologists, and nurses, we discuss best practices for the potential integration of emerging therapies such as ICIs into the treatment of BCG-naïve high-risk NMIBC. We emphasize the need for multidisciplinary care, either through formalized multidisciplinary teams or cross-discipline collaborative workflows adapted to local needs, to ensure efficient coordination and sharing of responsibilities. Specialized nurses have the potential to play key roles across multiple aspects of patient care. We also highlight the crucial importance of effective communication across teams, increases in resourcing, and education for healthcare professionals, patients, and caregivers to enable eligible patients with high-risk NMIBC to benefit optimally from the introduction of these potential new treatment options. Supplementary file2 (MP4 407382 kb).

Oncology and TherapyVol. 13(2)
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Pfizer (United States) (US), University of Toronto (CA), University of Washington (US), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (ES), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Pfizer (Germany) (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE), Dermatology Specialists (US), MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (ES), Carolina Urologic Research Center (US), University College London (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, Merck KGaA, Mirati Therapeutics, Advanced Accelerator Applications, UroGen Pharma, Eisai, Astellas Pharma, Ipsen, EUSA Pharma, Genentech, EMD Serono, Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
1.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.