Performance Comparison Between Deep Learning Models for Fault Classification in Transmission Lines Using Time Series Data

ABSTRACT Deep learning has become a vital tool for addressing complex challenges in power systems, particularly fault detection and classification in transmission lines. This study presents a comparative analysis of three advanced time‐series models like temporal convolutional networks (TCN), bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM), and gated recurrent units (GRU) for fault classification. Leveraging a comprehensive data set encompassing diverse fault scenarios like single‐phase to ground fault (AG), double line to ground fault (ABG), three‐phase fault (ABC) from both simulated and real transmission line data, the study provides a rigorous evaluation of these models’ performance under realistic conditions. The results demonstrate that TCN achieves a fault classification accuracy of 99.9%, significantly outperforming BiLSTM (92.31%) and GRU (95.27%), while also excelling in precision, recall, F 1 score, and training efficiency. Additionally, this study incorporates feature extraction techniques like discrete wavelet transform (CWT) to establish new benchmarks for fault classification. The findings underscore TCN's robustness in handling the dynamic nature of transmission line signals and its practical potential for real‐time applications, contributing to the development of more reliable and efficient power system fault classification systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Science & Engineering
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70033
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Power Systems Fault Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Comparison Between Deep Learning Models for Fault Classification in Transmission Lines Using Time Series Data

Muhammad Amir Raza, Muhammad Faheem, Mohsin Ali Tunio, Ashfaque Ahmed Hashmani et al.
11 citations
Energy Science & Engineering
Power Systems Fault Detection
13.36
article

Performance Comparison Between Deep Learning Models for Fault Classification in Transmission Lines Using Time Series Data

Muhammad Amir Raza, Muhammad Faheem, Mohsin Ali Tunio, Ashfaque Ahmed Hashmani, Rumaisa Nadeem
article en
11 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Deep learning has become a vital tool for addressing complex challenges in power systems, particularly fault detection and classification in transmission lines. This study presents a comparative analysis of three advanced time‐series models like temporal convolutional networks (TCN), bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM), and gated recurrent units (GRU) for fault classification. Leveraging a comprehensive data set encompassing diverse fault scenarios like single‐phase to ground fault (AG), double line to ground fault (ABG), three‐phase fault (ABC) from both simulated and real transmission line data, the study provides a rigorous evaluation of these models’ performance under realistic conditions. The results demonstrate that TCN achieves a fault classification accuracy of 99.9%, significantly outperforming BiLSTM (92.31%) and GRU (95.27%), while also excelling in precision, recall, F 1 score, and training efficiency. Additionally, this study incorporates feature extraction techniques like discrete wavelet transform (CWT) to establish new benchmarks for fault classification. The findings underscore TCN's robustness in handling the dynamic nature of transmission line signals and its practical potential for real‐time applications, contributing to the development of more reliable and efficient power system fault classification systems.

Energy Science & EngineeringVol. 13(5)
Mehran University of Engineering and Technology (PK), University of Saskatchewan (CA), VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
Teknologian Tutkimuskeskus VTT
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Power Systems Fault Detection
13.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.