Long-Term Participation after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Comparison to Orthopedic Trauma Controls: Results from a Longitudinal Multicenter Observational Cohort Study

A subgroup of patients shows incomplete recovery after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Outcomes are commonly measured on the level of symptoms or functional recovery. An alternative way to study outcome after mTBI is to measure the level of participation. The objectives of this study were to examine (1) the level of participation in patients with mTBI at 12 months post-injury in comparison to a non-head injury orthopedic trauma control group; (2) the relationship between the outcome domains participation, functional outcome, and post-concussion symptoms. A prospective, longitudinal, multicenter cohort study was conducted. Participants were 140 adults with mTBI and 144 adults with minor (non-head) orthopedic injury. The following outcomes were measured: participation (Utrecht Scale for Evaluation and Rehabilitation-Participation: USER-P), functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended: (GOS-E), and post-concussion symptoms (Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: RPQ). Adults with mTBI have a significantly lower objective participation level (USER-P Frequency scale) than controls. No differences were found between the groups on subjective participation (USER-P Restrictions and Satisfaction scales) nor on functional outcome (GOS-E). Fifty-three people with mTBI (38%) had a score of ≥2 on ≥3 items, while 26 (19%) had an unfavorable USER-P outcome (≥2 restrictions) and only 9 (6.5%) had an unfavorable GOS-E score (<7). In both groups, the presence of persistent symptoms led to a significantly unfavorable outcome on both the USER-P and GOS-E. Participation frequency is lower in mTBI than in orthopedic controls, mainly determined by a significantly lower number of hours of (un)paid work, education, and/or household activities. People with mTBI more often report post-concussion symptoms, but functional recovery is not different between the groups. Participation seems to better represent incomplete recovery than functional outcome, but future research should confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0413
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-Term Participation after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Comparison to Orthopedic Trauma Controls: Results from a Longitudinal Multicenter Observational Cohort Study

Sven Stapert, Melloney Wijenberg, Caroline M Van Heugten, Jessica Manders et al.
Journal of Neurotrauma
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Long-Term Participation after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Comparison to Orthopedic Trauma Controls: Results from a Longitudinal Multicenter Observational Cohort Study

Sven Stapert, Melloney Wijenberg, Caroline M Van Heugten, Jessica Manders, Jeanine Verbunt, Skye King
article en

Abstract

A subgroup of patients shows incomplete recovery after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Outcomes are commonly measured on the level of symptoms or functional recovery. An alternative way to study outcome after mTBI is to measure the level of participation. The objectives of this study were to examine (1) the level of participation in patients with mTBI at 12 months post-injury in comparison to a non-head injury orthopedic trauma control group; (2) the relationship between the outcome domains participation, functional outcome, and post-concussion symptoms. A prospective, longitudinal, multicenter cohort study was conducted. Participants were 140 adults with mTBI and 144 adults with minor (non-head) orthopedic injury. The following outcomes were measured: participation (Utrecht Scale for Evaluation and Rehabilitation-Participation: USER-P), functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended: (GOS-E), and post-concussion symptoms (Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: RPQ). Adults with mTBI have a significantly lower objective participation level (USER-P Frequency scale) than controls. No differences were found between the groups on subjective participation (USER-P Restrictions and Satisfaction scales) nor on functional outcome (GOS-E). Fifty-three people with mTBI (38%) had a score of ≥2 on ≥3 items, while 26 (19%) had an unfavorable USER-P outcome (≥2 restrictions) and only 9 (6.5%) had an unfavorable GOS-E score (<7). In both groups, the presence of persistent symptoms led to a significantly unfavorable outcome on both the USER-P and GOS-E. Participation frequency is lower in mTBI than in orthopedic controls, mainly determined by a significantly lower number of hours of (un)paid work, education, and/or household activities. People with mTBI more often report post-concussion symptoms, but functional recovery is not different between the groups. Participation seems to better represent incomplete recovery than functional outcome, but future research should confirm these findings.

Journal of NeurotraumaVol. 42(15-16)
Maastricht University (NL), VieCuri Medisch Centrum (NL), Zuyderland Medisch Centrum (NL), Brain Innovation (Netherlands) (NL), Adelante (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.