Comparative study of CO2 capture strategies in optimized MCFC-based power systems: Performance, cost, and environmental perspectives

The urgent need for CO2 reduction has accelerated research into carbon capture technologies. Molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFCs) offer an efficient pathway for both power generation and CO2 separation. This study presents a comprehensive technical, economic, and environmental assessment of six optimized MCFC-based power plant configurations, each integrated with different CO2 capture technologies: calcium looping (CaL), cryogenic CO2 capture (CCC), proton exchange membrane electrolyzer-based CO2 capture (PECC), oxygen membrane-based CO2 capture (OMCC), and vanadium chlorine-based CO2 capture (VCC). Simulations were conducted in Aspen Plus, evaluating thermodynamic performance, economic feasibility, and environmental impact. The results indicate that CaL achieves the highest CO2 capture efficiency (95 %), leading to an emission index as low as 110.2 g CO2/kWh, while MCFC alone emits 457.1 g CO2/kWh. The VCC and OMCC configurations demonstrate superior energy integration, achieving net electrical efficiencies of 53.5 % and 51.4 %, respectively. However, PECC exhibits the highest Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCoE) at €0.3547/kWh, primarily due to its significant power consumption of 35.7 MW (∼24.9 % of MCFC output). The CaL system, despite its high efficiency (86.5 % CHP), incurs a 21.6 % cost increase compared to the MCFC baseline. A multi-objective optimization approach was employed to identify the most balanced system, considering efficiency, cost, and CO2 capture effectiveness.The findings highlight the trade-offs between energy efficiency, capital costs, and emissions reduction, offering strategic insights for the development of low-emission power plants. This study advances the feasibility of hybrid MCFC-CCS systems, demonstrating their potential for near-zero emissions while maintaining economic viability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of CO2 Utilization
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2025.103085
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of CO2 capture strategies in optimized MCFC-based power systems: Performance, cost, and environmental perspectives

Navid Kousheshi, Ata Chitsaz, Ali Saberi Mehr, Amirali Nouri
7 citations
Journal of CO2 Utilization
Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
3.62
article

Comparative study of CO2 capture strategies in optimized MCFC-based power systems: Performance, cost, and environmental perspectives

Navid Kousheshi, Ata Chitsaz, Ali Saberi Mehr, Amirali Nouri
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The urgent need for CO2 reduction has accelerated research into carbon capture technologies. Molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFCs) offer an efficient pathway for both power generation and CO2 separation. This study presents a comprehensive technical, economic, and environmental assessment of six optimized MCFC-based power plant configurations, each integrated with different CO2 capture technologies: calcium looping (CaL), cryogenic CO2 capture (CCC), proton exchange membrane electrolyzer-based CO2 capture (PECC), oxygen membrane-based CO2 capture (OMCC), and vanadium chlorine-based CO2 capture (VCC). Simulations were conducted in Aspen Plus, evaluating thermodynamic performance, economic feasibility, and environmental impact. The results indicate that CaL achieves the highest CO2 capture efficiency (95 %), leading to an emission index as low as 110.2 g CO2/kWh, while MCFC alone emits 457.1 g CO2/kWh. The VCC and OMCC configurations demonstrate superior energy integration, achieving net electrical efficiencies of 53.5 % and 51.4 %, respectively. However, PECC exhibits the highest Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCoE) at €0.3547/kWh, primarily due to its significant power consumption of 35.7 MW (∼24.9 % of MCFC output). The CaL system, despite its high efficiency (86.5 % CHP), incurs a 21.6 % cost increase compared to the MCFC baseline. A multi-objective optimization approach was employed to identify the most balanced system, considering efficiency, cost, and CO2 capture effectiveness.The findings highlight the trade-offs between energy efficiency, capital costs, and emissions reduction, offering strategic insights for the development of low-emission power plants. This study advances the feasibility of hybrid MCFC-CCS systems, demonstrating their potential for near-zero emissions while maintaining economic viability.

Journal of CO2 UtilizationVol. 95
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
3.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.