Towards fast and reliable estimations of 3D pressure, velocity and wall shear stress in aortic blood flow: CFD-based machine learning approach

In this work, we developed deep neural networks for the fast and comprehensive estimation of the most salient features of aortic blood flow. These features include velocity magnitude and direction, 3D pressure, and wall shear stress. Starting from 40 subject-specific aortic geometries obtained from 4D Flow MRI, we applied statistical shape modeling to generate 1,000 synthetic aorta geometries. Complete computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of these geometries were performed to obtain ground-truth values. We then trained deep neural networks for each characteristic flow feature using 900 randomly selected aorta geometries. Testing on remaining 100 geometries resulted in average errors of 3.11% for velocity and 4.48% for pressure. For wall shear stress predictions, we applied two approaches: (i) directly derived from the neural network-predicted velocity, and, (ii) predicted from a separate neural network. Both approaches yielded similar accuracy, with average error of 4.8 and 4.7% compared to complete 3D CFD results, respectively. We recommend the second approach for potential clinical use due to its significantly simplified workflow. In conclusion, this proof-of-concept analysis demonstrates the numerical robustness, rapid calculation speed (less than seconds), and good accuracy of the CFD-based machine learning approach in predicting velocity, pressure, and wall shear stress distributions in subject-specific aortic flows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110137
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards fast and reliable estimations of 3D pressure, velocity and wall shear stress in aortic blood flow: CFD-based machine learning approach

Saša Kenjereš, Daiqi Lin
3 citations
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
4.16
article

Towards fast and reliable estimations of 3D pressure, velocity and wall shear stress in aortic blood flow: CFD-based machine learning approach

Saša Kenjereš, Daiqi Lin
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In this work, we developed deep neural networks for the fast and comprehensive estimation of the most salient features of aortic blood flow. These features include velocity magnitude and direction, 3D pressure, and wall shear stress. Starting from 40 subject-specific aortic geometries obtained from 4D Flow MRI, we applied statistical shape modeling to generate 1,000 synthetic aorta geometries. Complete computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of these geometries were performed to obtain ground-truth values. We then trained deep neural networks for each characteristic flow feature using 900 randomly selected aorta geometries. Testing on remaining 100 geometries resulted in average errors of 3.11% for velocity and 4.48% for pressure. For wall shear stress predictions, we applied two approaches: (i) directly derived from the neural network-predicted velocity, and, (ii) predicted from a separate neural network. Both approaches yielded similar accuracy, with average error of 4.8 and 4.7% compared to complete 3D CFD results, respectively. We recommend the second approach for potential clinical use due to its significantly simplified workflow. In conclusion, this proof-of-concept analysis demonstrates the numerical robustness, rapid calculation speed (less than seconds), and good accuracy of the CFD-based machine learning approach in predicting velocity, pressure, and wall shear stress distributions in subject-specific aortic flows.

Computers in Biology and MedicineVol. 191
J.M. Burgerscentrum (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
4.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.