Modeling spatial and social interdependency effects on commuting mode choice

• An autoregressive mode choice model is constructed to capture interdependency effects. • Interdependencies derive from both spatial proximity and attitudinal similarity. • Direct policy impacts can be separated from indirect effects of interdependency. • Social interactions account for 40 % of total policy effects on public transit use. • Travel time and bus stops proximity boost transit use more than travel costs changes. In daily life, individuals are influenced by the behaviors of others. The question of how far-reaching this social influence extends to travel behaviors has received significant attention in recent decades, through the capture of dyadic interaction effects that may exist among individuals. Along these lines, in the current study, we apply a Spatial-Attitudinal Probit Model (SAPM) that assumes an autoregressive lag structure in the utilities underlying individuals’ travel mode choice, specifically focusing on the choice between car and public transportation for commuting trips. Notably, the magnitude of interdependency among decision agents is measured by a global weight matrix, accounting for a dual source of influence: (1) spatial proximity, measured as the Euclidean distance between individuals’ residential locations, and (2) attitudinal similarities, specifically perceptions regarding sustainable mobility and environmental awareness. To our knowledge, this represents the first application of an autoregressive travel mode choice model accounting for both geographical and attitudinal proximity as simultaneous sources of interaction. The dataset for our analysis includes 2,347 observations, corresponding to the one-way commute trips of 2,347 individuals, as reported during a survey conducted between October 2019 and January 2020 in the metropolitan area of Cagliari, Italy. Our results reveal the significant role of social autoregressive parameters and the presence of interdependency effects among individuals’ commute mode choices. The utilization of a social lag structure allows for the separate identification of direct and indirect effects of explanatory variables. Notably, around 40% of the total effect is attributed to the indirect effects arising from individuals’ social interdependencies. This finding holds important implications for evaluating and planning potential future measures aimed at increasing public transit usage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104474
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling spatial and social interdependency effects on commuting mode choice

Daniele Giubergia, Italo Meloni, Angela J. Haddad, Francesco Piras et al.
2 citations
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
article

Modeling spatial and social interdependency effects on commuting mode choice

Daniele Giubergia, Italo Meloni, Angela J. Haddad, Francesco Piras, Chandra R. Bhat
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• An autoregressive mode choice model is constructed to capture interdependency effects. • Interdependencies derive from both spatial proximity and attitudinal similarity. • Direct policy impacts can be separated from indirect effects of interdependency. • Social interactions account for 40 % of total policy effects on public transit use. • Travel time and bus stops proximity boost transit use more than travel costs changes. In daily life, individuals are influenced by the behaviors of others. The question of how far-reaching this social influence extends to travel behaviors has received significant attention in recent decades, through the capture of dyadic interaction effects that may exist among individuals. Along these lines, in the current study, we apply a Spatial-Attitudinal Probit Model (SAPM) that assumes an autoregressive lag structure in the utilities underlying individuals’ travel mode choice, specifically focusing on the choice between car and public transportation for commuting trips. Notably, the magnitude of interdependency among decision agents is measured by a global weight matrix, accounting for a dual source of influence: (1) spatial proximity, measured as the Euclidean distance between individuals’ residential locations, and (2) attitudinal similarities, specifically perceptions regarding sustainable mobility and environmental awareness. To our knowledge, this represents the first application of an autoregressive travel mode choice model accounting for both geographical and attitudinal proximity as simultaneous sources of interaction. The dataset for our analysis includes 2,347 observations, corresponding to the one-way commute trips of 2,347 individuals, as reported during a survey conducted between October 2019 and January 2020 in the metropolitan area of Cagliari, Italy. Our results reveal the significant role of social autoregressive parameters and the presence of interdependency effects among individuals’ commute mode choices. The utilization of a social lag structure allows for the separate identification of direct and indirect effects of explanatory variables. Notably, around 40% of the total effect is attributed to the indirect effects arising from individuals’ social interdependencies. This finding holds important implications for evaluating and planning potential future measures aimed at increasing public transit usage.

Transportation Research Part A Policy and PracticeVol. 196
University of Cagliari (IT), Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia (IT), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.