Adhesion of bone cement to porous and nonporous 3D printed surfaces

Bone cement is an adhesive commonly used to bond orthopedic implants to bone during a surgical procedure. Total joint replacements such as total knee, hip, shoulder, or ankle arthroplasties have metal or polymer components that are commonly cemented. However, implant failures can occur via debonding at the implant-cement interface, suggesting sub-optimal adhesion of the cement to the implant. In parallel, the orthopedic implant industry is seeing a significant rise in additive manufacturing (AM), which enables the seamless integration of surface porosity enhanced osseointegration in cementless procedures. However, there is a lack of foundational data or understanding of how bone cement adheres to 3D printed surfaces as a function of varying topography. This study evaluates adhesion of cement to clinically relevant printed implant surfaces, porous topographies, and materials. Adhesion strength of cemented samples was tested in shear. Surface porous layers were compared to traditional implant surface finishes (blasted, machined, polished). The impact of 3D printed surface porosity size and depth was also investigated. Testing revealed that the adhesive strength of porous surfaces (26.3 ± 3.1 MPa) was more than double the adhesive strength of all non-porous surfaces (the highest being the as-printed surface with a strength of 11.3 ± 2.5 MPa). The study also demonstrated porosity and layer-depth dependent performance trade-offs, with the best performing group having a 2x2x2 mm<sup>3</sup> unit cell size and 0.50 mm layer depth and a shear strength of 26.31 ± 3.10 MPa. These results provide a foundation for improving designs of emerging 3D printed orthopedic implants that can be both cemented and cementless.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107019
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adhesion of bone cement to porous and nonporous 3D printed surfaces

Robert J. Tait, William Robert Walsh, Ken Gall, Caroline Alting
2 citations
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
1.35
article

Adhesion of bone cement to porous and nonporous 3D printed surfaces

Robert J. Tait, William Robert Walsh, Ken Gall, Caroline Alting
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Bone cement is an adhesive commonly used to bond orthopedic implants to bone during a surgical procedure. Total joint replacements such as total knee, hip, shoulder, or ankle arthroplasties have metal or polymer components that are commonly cemented. However, implant failures can occur via debonding at the implant-cement interface, suggesting sub-optimal adhesion of the cement to the implant. In parallel, the orthopedic implant industry is seeing a significant rise in additive manufacturing (AM), which enables the seamless integration of surface porosity enhanced osseointegration in cementless procedures. However, there is a lack of foundational data or understanding of how bone cement adheres to 3D printed surfaces as a function of varying topography. This study evaluates adhesion of cement to clinically relevant printed implant surfaces, porous topographies, and materials. Adhesion strength of cemented samples was tested in shear. Surface porous layers were compared to traditional implant surface finishes (blasted, machined, polished). The impact of 3D printed surface porosity size and depth was also investigated. Testing revealed that the adhesive strength of porous surfaces (26.3 ± 3.1 MPa) was more than double the adhesive strength of all non-porous surfaces (the highest being the as-printed surface with a strength of 11.3 ± 2.5 MPa). The study also demonstrated porosity and layer-depth dependent performance trade-offs, with the best performing group having a 2x2x2 mm<sup>3</sup> unit cell size and 0.50 mm layer depth and a shear strength of 26.31 ± 3.10 MPa. These results provide a foundation for improving designs of emerging 3D printed orthopedic implants that can be both cemented and cementless.

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materialsVol. 168
Duke University (US), UNSW Sydney (AU), Duke Energy (United States) (US), Orthopaedic Institute of Henderson (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.