Agricultural extension institutions in rural Cambodia: Unpacking extension agent-farmer relations and interactions

Agricultural extension depends substantially on extension agent-farmer relations and interactions, which contribute to enhancing livelihoods, agricultural and rural development. These social engagements are influenced by the spheres of institutions that underpin extension practices on the ground. This paper examines how rural institutions shape extension agent-farmer relations and interactions in Cambodia, and how these impact on the levels of their engagement in extension activities. Drawing on empirical data collected from semi-structured interviews with forty-eight experts who work on agrarian studies and rural development in Cambodia and Southeast Asia, the paper argues that rural institutions in Cambodia are characterised by two major institutional boundaries (i.e., formal and informal) which shape varying forms of extension-related interactions among rural actors. The paper reveals that extension agents’ limited presence on the ground and infrequent interactions with farmers minimise opportunities for diffusion and (co)-production of knowledge. The paper offers a theoretical understanding of agricultural extension in the context of the Global South that, while strengthening extension agent-farmer relations and interactions is essential, advancing agricultural extension should recognise the complementary role of the two institutions in contributing to the everyday extension practices of rural communities. Reframing these institution-based agricultural extension pathways would mobilise synergies among rural actors towards improved agricultural and rural development. • Agricultural extension depends on extension agent-farmer relations and interactions. • Rural institutions in Cambodia are characterised by two primary institutional boundaries (formal and informal). • Institutional boundaries shape varying forms of extension-related relations and interactions among rural actors. • Informal institutions play an important role in the everyday extension practices of rural Cambodian communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103671
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agricultural extension institutions in rural Cambodia: Unpacking extension agent-farmer relations and interactions

Brian R. Cook, Thong Anh Tran, Van Touch
3 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
14.50
article

Agricultural extension institutions in rural Cambodia: Unpacking extension agent-farmer relations and interactions

Brian R. Cook, Thong Anh Tran, Van Touch
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Agricultural extension depends substantially on extension agent-farmer relations and interactions, which contribute to enhancing livelihoods, agricultural and rural development. These social engagements are influenced by the spheres of institutions that underpin extension practices on the ground. This paper examines how rural institutions shape extension agent-farmer relations and interactions in Cambodia, and how these impact on the levels of their engagement in extension activities. Drawing on empirical data collected from semi-structured interviews with forty-eight experts who work on agrarian studies and rural development in Cambodia and Southeast Asia, the paper argues that rural institutions in Cambodia are characterised by two major institutional boundaries (i.e., formal and informal) which shape varying forms of extension-related interactions among rural actors. The paper reveals that extension agents’ limited presence on the ground and infrequent interactions with farmers minimise opportunities for diffusion and (co)-production of knowledge. The paper offers a theoretical understanding of agricultural extension in the context of the Global South that, while strengthening extension agent-farmer relations and interactions is essential, advancing agricultural extension should recognise the complementary role of the two institutions in contributing to the everyday extension practices of rural communities. Reframing these institution-based agricultural extension pathways would mobilise synergies among rural actors towards improved agricultural and rural development. • Agricultural extension depends on extension agent-farmer relations and interactions. • Rural institutions in Cambodia are characterised by two primary institutional boundaries (formal and informal). • Institutional boundaries shape varying forms of extension-related relations and interactions among rural actors. • Informal institutions play an important role in the everyday extension practices of rural Cambodian communities.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 117
Australian National University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), An Giang University (VN)
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
14.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.