Enforcing physics onto PINNs for more accurate inhomogeneous material identification

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are computationally efficient tools for addressing inverse problems in solid mechanics, but often face accuracy limitations when compared to traditional methods. We introduce a refined PINN approach that rigorously enforces certain physics constraints, improving accuracy while retaining the computational benefits of PINNs. Unlike conventional PINNs, which are trained to approximate (differential) equations, this method incorporates classical techniques, such as stress potentials, to satisfy certain physical laws. The result is a physics-enforced PINN that combines the precision of the Constitutive Equation Gap Method (CEGM) with the automatic differentiation and optimization frameworks characteristic of PINNs. Numerical comparisons reveal that the enforced PINN approach indeed achieves near-CEGM accuracy while preserving the efficiency advantages of PINNs. Validation through real experimental data demonstrates the ability of the method to accurately identify material properties and inclusion geometries in inhomogeneous samples. • A fast and accurate inverse strategy for inhomogeneous material identification. • Classical methods, such as stress potentials, can be combined with machine learning. • Enforcing physics phenomena is more accurate than teaching it to the neural-network. • Do not teach neural-networks things that are easily enforced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2025.117993
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enforcing physics onto PINNs for more accurate inhomogeneous material identification

Éric Florentin, Gilles Lubineau, Bram van der Heijden, Xiaole Li
8 citations
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
5.71
article

Enforcing physics onto PINNs for more accurate inhomogeneous material identification

Éric Florentin, Gilles Lubineau, Bram van der Heijden, Xiaole Li
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are computationally efficient tools for addressing inverse problems in solid mechanics, but often face accuracy limitations when compared to traditional methods. We introduce a refined PINN approach that rigorously enforces certain physics constraints, improving accuracy while retaining the computational benefits of PINNs. Unlike conventional PINNs, which are trained to approximate (differential) equations, this method incorporates classical techniques, such as stress potentials, to satisfy certain physical laws. The result is a physics-enforced PINN that combines the precision of the Constitutive Equation Gap Method (CEGM) with the automatic differentiation and optimization frameworks characteristic of PINNs. Numerical comparisons reveal that the enforced PINN approach indeed achieves near-CEGM accuracy while preserving the efficiency advantages of PINNs. Validation through real experimental data demonstrates the ability of the method to accurately identify material properties and inclusion geometries in inhomogeneous samples. • A fast and accurate inverse strategy for inhomogeneous material identification. • Classical methods, such as stress potentials, can be combined with machine learning. • Enforcing physics phenomena is more accurate than teaching it to the neural-network. • Do not teach neural-networks things that are easily enforced.

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and EngineeringVol. 441
Université de Tours (FR), Université d'Orléans (FR), Services déconcentrés d'appui à la recherche Val de Loire (FR), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées Centre Val de Loire (FR), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA), Delft University of Technology (NL)
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
5.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.