Capacity remuneration mechanisms for decarbonized power systems

Motivated by generation system adequacy concerns, many European countries have introduced capacity remuneration mechanisms (CRMs) to ensure sufficient investments in power generation. However, it is uncertain whether the existing CRMs will promote sufficient adequacy and flexibility in a decarbonized power system, where supply and demand will become more weather-dependent. We assess the effectiveness of a centralized capacity market, a strategic reserve, and a decentralized capacity market via capacity subscriptions in a climate-neutral, weather-driven power system. We develop a co-simulation of two agent-based models simulating myopia in both operational and investment decisions. We simulate weather uncertainty by running the model with 40 different weather years. Our results from a case study based on the Netherlands indicate that a strategic reserve may increase electricity price volatility in the long-term. A centralized capacity market is more cost-effective than a strategic reserve, but administratively setting its parameters is prone to over- or underprocurement. Capacity subscription allows consumers to select their desired level of reliability. Results indicate that these decentralized capacity markets may yield a clearer signal for the needed dispatchable capacity and promote demand-side response, but it may be challenging to provide long-term certainty for investors. • In a system with high renewable energy and high flexibility, the use of a strategic reserve may increase the volatility of electricity prices. It will also be difficult to parametrize. • With a capacity market, the parametrization of the demand curve and the derating factors also become more challenging in a system with more renewable energy and flexibility. • A capacity subscription reveals the consumers’ need for capacity during scarcity periods. However, the short contract duration may lead to investment cycles or to under investments if consumers do not consider the risk of extreme weather events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Energy
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125878
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electric Power System Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capacity remuneration mechanisms for decarbonized power systems

Laurens J. de Vries, Kenneth Bruninx, Ingrid Sanchez Jimenez
1 citations
Applied Energy
Electric Power System Optimization
0.73
article

Capacity remuneration mechanisms for decarbonized power systems

Laurens J. de Vries, Kenneth Bruninx, Ingrid Sanchez Jimenez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Motivated by generation system adequacy concerns, many European countries have introduced capacity remuneration mechanisms (CRMs) to ensure sufficient investments in power generation. However, it is uncertain whether the existing CRMs will promote sufficient adequacy and flexibility in a decarbonized power system, where supply and demand will become more weather-dependent. We assess the effectiveness of a centralized capacity market, a strategic reserve, and a decentralized capacity market via capacity subscriptions in a climate-neutral, weather-driven power system. We develop a co-simulation of two agent-based models simulating myopia in both operational and investment decisions. We simulate weather uncertainty by running the model with 40 different weather years. Our results from a case study based on the Netherlands indicate that a strategic reserve may increase electricity price volatility in the long-term. A centralized capacity market is more cost-effective than a strategic reserve, but administratively setting its parameters is prone to over- or underprocurement. Capacity subscription allows consumers to select their desired level of reliability. Results indicate that these decentralized capacity markets may yield a clearer signal for the needed dispatchable capacity and promote demand-side response, but it may be challenging to provide long-term certainty for investors. • In a system with high renewable energy and high flexibility, the use of a strategic reserve may increase the volatility of electricity prices. It will also be difficult to parametrize. • With a capacity market, the parametrization of the demand curve and the derating factors also become more challenging in a system with more renewable energy and flexibility. • A capacity subscription reveals the consumers’ need for capacity during scarcity periods. However, the short contract duration may lead to investment cycles or to under investments if consumers do not consider the risk of extreme weather events.

Applied EnergyVol. 391
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Electric Power System Optimization
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.