Borrowing on the wrong side of the tracks: Evidence from mortgage loan discontinuities

How much does the liquidity of the secondary market matter for the pricing of the housing market? In this paper, we investigate a discontinuity in the supply of mortgages called the “conforming loan limit.” Mortgage loans smaller than this limit are eligible to be purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—and therefore, they are more easily underwritten and more readily supplied by lenders. Using county-level variation in this limit and a border discontinuity model with transaction-level data, we estimate that a 10% increase in this limit leads to a 3% to 4% increase in housing prices. We identify the transmission mechanism primarily at the intensive margins, as the higher conforming loan limit leads to larger individual loans and therefore a greater volume of total lending. We show evidence that this effect is likely driven by greater availability, rather than lower interest pricing, of conforming loans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Banking & Finance
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2025.107438
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Borrowing on the wrong side of the tracks: Evidence from mortgage loan discontinuities

G. Welke, Anthony W. Orlando
Journal of Banking & Finance
Housing Market and Economics
article

Borrowing on the wrong side of the tracks: Evidence from mortgage loan discontinuities

G. Welke, Anthony W. Orlando
article en

Abstract

How much does the liquidity of the secondary market matter for the pricing of the housing market? In this paper, we investigate a discontinuity in the supply of mortgages called the “conforming loan limit.” Mortgage loans smaller than this limit are eligible to be purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—and therefore, they are more easily underwritten and more readily supplied by lenders. Using county-level variation in this limit and a border discontinuity model with transaction-level data, we estimate that a 10% increase in this limit leads to a 3% to 4% increase in housing prices. We identify the transmission mechanism primarily at the intensive margins, as the higher conforming loan limit leads to larger individual loans and therefore a greater volume of total lending. We show evidence that this effect is likely driven by greater availability, rather than lower interest pricing, of conforming loans.

Journal of Banking & FinanceVol. 176
Pomona College (US), California State Polytechnic University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Housing Market and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Borrowing on the wrong side of the tracks: Evidence from mortgage loan discontinuities — G. Welke, Anthony W. Orlando · Journal of Banking & Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS