Use of No-Cost Preventive Services Jeopardized by <i>Kennedy v Braidwood</i>

This cross-sectional study analyzes the use of 10 no-cost preventive services by individuals with employer-sponsored health insurance, which may be threatened by the upcoming Kennedy v Braidwood Supreme Court case.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Health Forum
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1559
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of No-Cost Preventive Services Jeopardized by Kennedy v Braidwood

Minttu M. Rönn, Nicole A. Swartwood, Joshua A. Salomon, Adrienne Sabety et al.
3 citations
JAMA Health Forum
Healthcare Policy and Management
9.39
article

Use of No-Cost Preventive Services Jeopardized by Kennedy v Braidwood

Minttu M. Rönn, Nicole A. Swartwood, Joshua A. Salomon, Adrienne Sabety, Michelle Bronsard
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This cross-sectional study analyzes the use of 10 no-cost preventive services by individuals with employer-sponsored health insurance, which may be threatened by the upcoming Kennedy v Braidwood Supreme Court case.

JAMA Health ForumVol. 6(4)
Harvard Global Health Institute (US), Stanford University (US)
National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Healthcare Policy and Management
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.