An Open Path to DAG: Navigating Causal Inference in Epidemiological Research

Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are a valuable tool in epidemiology for illustrating causal relationships between variables in epidemiological research. DAGs enhance the transparency and robustness of the causal inference by delineating causal paths and identifying confounders, mediators, and colliders. It helps the researcher to identify the minimal number of variables that need to be adjusted to eliminate the effect of confounders on the causal relationships. However, this is not being widely used in epidemiological research, and when used, there is considerable variation in the way it is utilized and reported. One reason is the researchers' lack of practical knowledge on using and reporting DAGs in their studies. This article will introduce the basic concepts of DAGs to help public health researchers familiarize themselves with the various terms used in DAGs. In addition, the illustrative example provided in the article will help researchers to draw, interpret, and report DAGs in their epidemiological studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Community Medicine
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_735_24
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Open Path to DAG: Navigating Causal Inference in Epidemiological Research

Madhanraj Kalyanasundaram, Navaneeth S. Krishna, Tarun Bhatnagar
Indian Journal of Community Medicine
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

An Open Path to DAG: Navigating Causal Inference in Epidemiological Research

Madhanraj Kalyanasundaram, Navaneeth S. Krishna, Tarun Bhatnagar
article en

Abstract

Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are a valuable tool in epidemiology for illustrating causal relationships between variables in epidemiological research. DAGs enhance the transparency and robustness of the causal inference by delineating causal paths and identifying confounders, mediators, and colliders. It helps the researcher to identify the minimal number of variables that need to be adjusted to eliminate the effect of confounders on the causal relationships. However, this is not being widely used in epidemiological research, and when used, there is considerable variation in the way it is utilized and reported. One reason is the researchers' lack of practical knowledge on using and reporting DAGs in their studies. This article will introduce the basic concepts of DAGs to help public health researchers familiarize themselves with the various terms used in DAGs. In addition, the illustrative example provided in the article will help researchers to draw, interpret, and report DAGs in their epidemiological studies.

Indian Journal of Community MedicineVol. 50(4)
National Institute of Epidemiology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Open Path to DAG: Navigating Causal Inference in Epidemiological Research — Madhanraj Kalyanasundaram, Navaneeth S. Krishna, et al. · Indian Journal of Community Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS