Analysis of Students’ Errors in Solving Algebraic Function Limit Problems based on Bloom’s Taxonomy

Understanding mathematical concepts is a fundamental component in effective mathematics learning. When students lack conceptual understanding, their ability to solve problems accurately such as in the topic of algebraic function limits is significantly hindered. This study aims to identify the causes of students’ incorrect answers in solving limit problems of algebraic functions based on Bloom's Taxonomy. A qualitative descriptive research method was employed to explore this issue. Data were collected using a written test consisting of three essay questions constructed to represent different levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy, followed by brief interviews with selected students. The research involved Grade 11 students who had previously studied the limit of algebraic functions. The students' answers were analyzed to classify types of errors and identify patterns related to specific cognitive levels. The results indicated that all students answered correctly at the C1 and C2 levels (remembering and understanding). However, at the C3 and C4 levels (applying and analyzing), students commonly made Encoding Errors and Transformation Errors. At the higher cognitive levels C5 and C6 (evaluating and creating) Process Skills Errors and Comprehension Errors were more prevalent. These findings suggest that students struggle more as the cognitive demands of questions increase, indicating a lack of problem solving practice and insufficient exposure to high level thinking tasks. In conclusion, strengthening instructional strategies that target higher order thinking skills is necessary to help students develop deeper mathematical understanding.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v8i1.27152
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Students’ Errors in Solving Algebraic Function Limit Problems based on Bloom’s Taxonomy

Rama Nida Siregar, Sakdiah Sakdiah
(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
article

Analysis of Students’ Errors in Solving Algebraic Function Limit Problems based on Bloom’s Taxonomy

Rama Nida Siregar, Sakdiah Sakdiah
article en

Abstract

Understanding mathematical concepts is a fundamental component in effective mathematics learning. When students lack conceptual understanding, their ability to solve problems accurately such as in the topic of algebraic function limits is significantly hindered. This study aims to identify the causes of students’ incorrect answers in solving limit problems of algebraic functions based on Bloom's Taxonomy. A qualitative descriptive research method was employed to explore this issue. Data were collected using a written test consisting of three essay questions constructed to represent different levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy, followed by brief interviews with selected students. The research involved Grade 11 students who had previously studied the limit of algebraic functions. The students' answers were analyzed to classify types of errors and identify patterns related to specific cognitive levels. The results indicated that all students answered correctly at the C1 and C2 levels (remembering and understanding). However, at the C3 and C4 levels (applying and analyzing), students commonly made Encoding Errors and Transformation Errors. At the higher cognitive levels C5 and C6 (evaluating and creating) Process Skills Errors and Comprehension Errors were more prevalent. These findings suggest that students struggle more as the cognitive demands of questions increase, indicating a lack of problem solving practice and insufficient exposure to high level thinking tasks. In conclusion, strengthening instructional strategies that target higher order thinking skills is necessary to help students develop deeper mathematical understanding.

(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNINGVol. 8(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of Students’ Errors in Solving Algebraic Function Limit Problems based on Bloom’s Taxonomy — Rama Nida Siregar, Sakdiah Sakdiah · (JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS