Cosmological limits on the neutrino mass sum for beyond-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>CDM</mml:mi></mml:math> models

The sum of neutrino masses can be measured cosmologically, as the sub-eV particles behave as “hot” dark matter whose main effect is to suppress the clustering of matter compared to a universe with the same amount of purely cold dark matter. Current astronomical data provide an upper limit on <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:mo>∑</a:mo><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi>m</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mi>ν</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub></a:mrow></a:math> between 0.07–0.12 eV at 95% confidence, depending on the choice of data. This bound assumes that the cosmological model is <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mrow><c:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</c:mi></c:mrow></c:math> Cold Dark Matter (<f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><f:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</f:mi><f:mi>CDM</f:mi></f:math>), where dark energy is a cosmological constant, the spatial geometry is flat, and the primordial fluctuations follow a pure power law. Here, we update studies on how the mass limit degrades if we relax these assumptions. To existing data from the satellite we add new gravitational lensing data from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope, the new Type Ia supernova sample from the <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mrow><i:mi>Pantheon</i:mi><i:mo>+</i:mo><i:mtext>survey</i:mtext></i:mrow></i:math>, and baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument. Using our fiducial data combination, described in the appendix, we find the neutrino mass limit is stable to most model extensions, with such extensions degrading the limit by less than 10%. We find a broadest bound of <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mrow><k:mo>∑</k:mo><k:msub><k:mrow><k:mi>m</k:mi></k:mrow><k:mrow><k:mi>ν</k:mi></k:mrow></k:msub><k:mo>&lt;</k:mo><k:mn>0.19</k:mn><k:mtext> </k:mtext><k:mtext> </k:mtext><k:mi>eV</k:mi></k:mrow></k:math> at 95% confidence for a model with dynamical dark energy, although this scenario is not statistically preferred over the simpler <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</m:mi><m:mi>CDM</m:mi></m:math> model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.083535
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cosmological limits on the neutrino mass sum for beyond-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>CDM</mml:mi></mml:math> models

Frank J. Qu, Jahmour J. Givans, Jo Dunkley, Gerrit S. Farren et al.
9 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
16.83
article

Cosmological limits on the neutrino mass sum for beyond-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>CDM</mml:mi></mml:math> models

Frank J. Qu, Jahmour J. Givans, Jo Dunkley, Gerrit S. Farren, Mathew S. Madhavacheril, Helen Shao, Blake D. Sherwin
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The sum of neutrino masses can be measured cosmologically, as the sub-eV particles behave as “hot” dark matter whose main effect is to suppress the clustering of matter compared to a universe with the same amount of purely cold dark matter. Current astronomical data provide an upper limit on <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:mo>∑</a:mo><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi>m</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mi>ν</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub></a:mrow></a:math> between 0.07–0.12 eV at 95% confidence, depending on the choice of data. This bound assumes that the cosmological model is <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mrow><c:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</c:mi></c:mrow></c:math> Cold Dark Matter (<f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><f:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</f:mi><f:mi>CDM</f:mi></f:math>), where dark energy is a cosmological constant, the spatial geometry is flat, and the primordial fluctuations follow a pure power law. Here, we update studies on how the mass limit degrades if we relax these assumptions. To existing data from the satellite we add new gravitational lensing data from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope, the new Type Ia supernova sample from the <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mrow><i:mi>Pantheon</i:mi><i:mo>+</i:mo><i:mtext>survey</i:mtext></i:mrow></i:math>, and baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument. Using our fiducial data combination, described in the appendix, we find the neutrino mass limit is stable to most model extensions, with such extensions degrading the limit by less than 10%. We find a broadest bound of <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mrow><k:mo>∑</k:mo><k:msub><k:mrow><k:mi>m</k:mi></k:mrow><k:mrow><k:mi>ν</k:mi></k:mrow></k:msub><k:mo>&lt;</k:mo><k:mn>0.19</k:mn><k:mtext> </k:mtext><k:mtext> </k:mtext><k:mi>eV</k:mi></k:mrow></k:math> at 95% confidence for a model with dynamical dark energy, although this scenario is not statistically preferred over the simpler <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</m:mi><m:mi>CDM</m:mi></m:math> model.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 111(8)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Princeton University (US), University of Cambridge (GB), SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US), University of California System (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US), Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (US), Flatiron Health (United States) (US), Flatiron Institute (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
16.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.