Aligning NIH’s Indirect Cost Recovery Rates With Foundation Rates Is Bad Policy

This JAMA Health Forum discusses recent guidance from the National Institutes of Health regarding the indirect cost recovery rate and its potential to diminish US science research and increase the influence of foundations on the operations of US universities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Health Forum
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1700
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aligning NIH’s Indirect Cost Recovery Rates With Foundation Rates Is Bad Policy

Sherry Glied
2 citations
JAMA Health Forum
Health and Medical Research Impacts
3.76
article

Aligning NIH’s Indirect Cost Recovery Rates With Foundation Rates Is Bad Policy

Sherry Glied
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This JAMA Health Forum discusses recent guidance from the National Institutes of Health regarding the indirect cost recovery rate and its potential to diminish US science research and increase the influence of foundations on the operations of US universities.

JAMA Health ForumVol. 6(4)
Wagner College (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.