Similarity-Based Nonlinear Settlement Predictions of Circular Surface Footings on Clay

In 1951, Skempton introduced the concept of similarity to obtain predictions of non-linear settlement of rigid circular footings on deep clay deposits under undrained conditions. This approach is based on the premise that the pressure-settlement curve of the footing and a stress-strain curve from a characteristic point in the soil can be linearly scaled to collapse into a single “master” curve. The method has been extended to predict deflections of axially and laterally loaded piles and is widely used in the offshore industry. Despite the theoretical and practical appeal of the method as well as its wide application in a range of geotechnical problems, limited investigation and validation exists in the literature. In this work, (1) existing “classical” similarity methods are reviewed, including a Boussinesq solution for elastic soil and the Mobilisable Strength Design (MSD) method by Bolton and coworkers. (2) The similarity factors derived from these methods are compared with those obtained from a novel non-linear cone model solution. (3) The resulting expressions are evaluated against rigorous numerical analyses undertaken by the authors in FLAC. These are based on two different non-linear constitutive models calibrated against triaxial tests from three clay deposits. Two alternative families of similarity methods are also compared with classical similarity. (4) Firstly, a “two-part” similarity technique (based on separate scaling factors for elastic and plastic strains) and (5) secondly, a “stiffness” similarity approach introduced by Atkinson (based on secant stiffness degradation). Finally, (6) three field test results are evaluated as case studies to demonstrate the applicability of the method in real-life problems. It is concluded that similarity approaches offer a rational yet approximate tool for non-linear settlement analysis of footings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jggefk.gteng-12641
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Similarity-Based Nonlinear Settlement Predictions of Circular Surface Footings on Clay

Dimitris K Karamitros, Abigail H. Bateman, Jamie J. Crispin, George Mylonakis
1 citations
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
1.30
article

Similarity-Based Nonlinear Settlement Predictions of Circular Surface Footings on Clay

Dimitris K Karamitros, Abigail H. Bateman, Jamie J. Crispin, George Mylonakis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In 1951, Skempton introduced the concept of similarity to obtain predictions of non-linear settlement of rigid circular footings on deep clay deposits under undrained conditions. This approach is based on the premise that the pressure-settlement curve of the footing and a stress-strain curve from a characteristic point in the soil can be linearly scaled to collapse into a single “master” curve. The method has been extended to predict deflections of axially and laterally loaded piles and is widely used in the offshore industry. Despite the theoretical and practical appeal of the method as well as its wide application in a range of geotechnical problems, limited investigation and validation exists in the literature. In this work, (1) existing “classical” similarity methods are reviewed, including a Boussinesq solution for elastic soil and the Mobilisable Strength Design (MSD) method by Bolton and coworkers. (2) The similarity factors derived from these methods are compared with those obtained from a novel non-linear cone model solution. (3) The resulting expressions are evaluated against rigorous numerical analyses undertaken by the authors in FLAC. These are based on two different non-linear constitutive models calibrated against triaxial tests from three clay deposits. Two alternative families of similarity methods are also compared with classical similarity. (4) Firstly, a “two-part” similarity technique (based on separate scaling factors for elastic and plastic strains) and (5) secondly, a “stiffness” similarity approach introduced by Atkinson (based on secant stiffness degradation). Finally, (6) three field test results are evaluated as case studies to demonstrate the applicability of the method in real-life problems. It is concluded that similarity approaches offer a rational yet approximate tool for non-linear settlement analysis of footings.

Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental EngineeringVol. 151(7)
Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE), University of Bristol (GB), University of Oxford (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.