Impact of Surfactant-Induced IFT Reduction and Wettability Alteration on CO<sub>2</sub> Foam Injectivity in Saline Aquifer Storage

Foam-assisted CO2 injection enhances CO2 storage in saline aquifers. However, most previous studies focused only on the benefits afforded by foam injection; they did not address the associated downsides, such as the high injection pressure that impedes CO2 injectivity. This study investigated the effects of foam-based CO2 storage on CO2 injectivity using three scenarios: a base case (supercritical CO2 injection without foam); conventional foam injection (CFI), where only the reduction in CO2 mobility is considered; and foam injection into a reservoir preflooded with surfactant (Surf-FI). In the last scenario, the effect of surfactant on interfacial tension (IFT) reduction and changes in wettability were considered, as was the reduction in CO2 mobility induced by the foam. In addition, the study evaluated the impact of injection well orientation on CO2 injectivity by considering both horizontal and vertical wells. We used the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (MRST–CO2 Lab) to forecast the long-term behavior of injected CO2 with and without foam. The results show that foam injection reduced the travel distance of the CO2 plume and increased the vertical extent thereof (the CO2 plume depth). However, foam injection impeded CO2 injectivity, reducing the anticipated injection rates. Surfactant reduced the IFT and also affected wettability during foam injection; this reduced the pressure buildup and increased the CO2 injection rate. A horizontal well exhibited better injectivity than a vertical well. We offer the following insights based on the simulation results. First, foam injection into reservoirs experiencing high CO2 injectivity levels may be inappropriate. Conversely, for reservoirs into which smaller amounts of CO2 are injected, and for which CO2 storage optimization is paramount, foam injection may be helpful. Second, horizontal wells are best suited to foam-based CO2 storage, especially in reservoirs requiring high-volume CO2 injection. Third, the economic aspects of foam injection into saline aquifers require further study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c00707
Primary Topic
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Surfactant-Induced IFT Reduction and Wettability Alteration on CO2 Foam Injectivity in Saline Aquifer Storage

Joseph Iranzi, Digne Edmond Rwabuhungu Rwatangabo, Yong-Chan Park, Hanam Son
Energy & Fuels
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
article

Impact of Surfactant-Induced IFT Reduction and Wettability Alteration on CO2 Foam Injectivity in Saline Aquifer Storage

Joseph Iranzi, Digne Edmond Rwabuhungu Rwatangabo, Yong-Chan Park, Hanam Son
article en

Abstract

Foam-assisted CO2 injection enhances CO2 storage in saline aquifers. However, most previous studies focused only on the benefits afforded by foam injection; they did not address the associated downsides, such as the high injection pressure that impedes CO2 injectivity. This study investigated the effects of foam-based CO2 storage on CO2 injectivity using three scenarios: a base case (supercritical CO2 injection without foam); conventional foam injection (CFI), where only the reduction in CO2 mobility is considered; and foam injection into a reservoir preflooded with surfactant (Surf-FI). In the last scenario, the effect of surfactant on interfacial tension (IFT) reduction and changes in wettability were considered, as was the reduction in CO2 mobility induced by the foam. In addition, the study evaluated the impact of injection well orientation on CO2 injectivity by considering both horizontal and vertical wells. We used the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (MRST–CO2 Lab) to forecast the long-term behavior of injected CO2 with and without foam. The results show that foam injection reduced the travel distance of the CO2 plume and increased the vertical extent thereof (the CO2 plume depth). However, foam injection impeded CO2 injectivity, reducing the anticipated injection rates. Surfactant reduced the IFT and also affected wettability during foam injection; this reduced the pressure buildup and increased the CO2 injection rate. A horizontal well exhibited better injectivity than a vertical well. We offer the following insights based on the simulation results. First, foam injection into reservoirs experiencing high CO2 injectivity levels may be inappropriate. Conversely, for reservoirs into which smaller amounts of CO2 are injected, and for which CO2 storage optimization is paramount, foam injection may be helpful. Second, horizontal wells are best suited to foam-based CO2 storage, especially in reservoirs requiring high-volume CO2 injection. Third, the economic aspects of foam injection into saline aquifers require further study.

Energy & FuelsVol. 39(17)
University of Rwanda (RW), Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KR), Pukyong National University (KR)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.