Aquatic and terrestrial environmental DNA signals reveal decoupling of blue-green communities along an urbanization gradient

• Aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates display highly divergent patterns of alpha and beta diversity. • Aquatic taxa respond to local habitat quality, whereas terrestrial taxa rely more on landscape habitat quantity. • Aquatic and terrestrial communities became increasingly dissimilar with increasing levels of urbanization. • Environmental DNA from aquatic and terrestrial samples provide complementary assessment of biodiversity. • Newly adapted primers showed high specificity to Metazoans with both water and soil samples. Urban blue and green spaces, like ponds and parks, can mitigate the negative effects of urbanization on biodiversity by providing diverse, connected habitats and enabling resource flows between ecosystems. While studies have evaluated these spaces for terrestrial and aquatic communities individually, few have examined shared factors influencing both communities simultaneously. Consequently, it is unclear how these spaces should be conceived and maintained to support the diversity of both aquatic and terrestrial species, as well as their interactions. Here, we use environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to identify shared drivers and assess if and how aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate communities are coupled across 54 paired aquatic and terrestrial habitats along an urbanization gradient in the city of Zurich, Switzerland. Contrary to general expectations, we find no significant correlation in aquatic and terrestrial community structure, which we attribute to distinct drivers identified for both communities. Aquatic communities were primarily influenced by local factors related to habitat quality, while terrestrial communities were associated to landscape drivers pertaining to habitat quantity, suggesting that different processes at different spatial scales need to be considered to support both communities. Furthermore, with increasing urbanization, aquatic and terrestrial communities exhibited signs of decoupling driven by the filtering of organisms straddling ecosystem boundaries. We conclude that increasing levels of urbanization weaken resource flow between aquatic and terrestrial environments. By employing eDNA across ecosystem boundaries, our study highlights the critical importance of both the quality and quantity of urban habitats in conserving aquatic and terrestrial communities, as well as their linkages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape and Urban Planning
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105376
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aquatic and terrestrial environmental DNA signals reveal decoupling of blue-green communities along an urbanization gradient

Marco Moretti, Florian Altermatt, Andreas Dietzel, Lauren M. Cook et al.
4 citations
Landscape and Urban Planning
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
6.87
article

Aquatic and terrestrial environmental DNA signals reveal decoupling of blue-green communities along an urbanization gradient

Marco Moretti, Florian Altermatt, Andreas Dietzel, Lauren M. Cook, Kilian Perrelet
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates display highly divergent patterns of alpha and beta diversity. • Aquatic taxa respond to local habitat quality, whereas terrestrial taxa rely more on landscape habitat quantity. • Aquatic and terrestrial communities became increasingly dissimilar with increasing levels of urbanization. • Environmental DNA from aquatic and terrestrial samples provide complementary assessment of biodiversity. • Newly adapted primers showed high specificity to Metazoans with both water and soil samples. Urban blue and green spaces, like ponds and parks, can mitigate the negative effects of urbanization on biodiversity by providing diverse, connected habitats and enabling resource flows between ecosystems. While studies have evaluated these spaces for terrestrial and aquatic communities individually, few have examined shared factors influencing both communities simultaneously. Consequently, it is unclear how these spaces should be conceived and maintained to support the diversity of both aquatic and terrestrial species, as well as their interactions. Here, we use environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to identify shared drivers and assess if and how aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate communities are coupled across 54 paired aquatic and terrestrial habitats along an urbanization gradient in the city of Zurich, Switzerland. Contrary to general expectations, we find no significant correlation in aquatic and terrestrial community structure, which we attribute to distinct drivers identified for both communities. Aquatic communities were primarily influenced by local factors related to habitat quality, while terrestrial communities were associated to landscape drivers pertaining to habitat quantity, suggesting that different processes at different spatial scales need to be considered to support both communities. Furthermore, with increasing urbanization, aquatic and terrestrial communities exhibited signs of decoupling driven by the filtering of organisms straddling ecosystem boundaries. We conclude that increasing levels of urbanization weaken resource flow between aquatic and terrestrial environments. By employing eDNA across ecosystem boundaries, our study highlights the critical importance of both the quality and quantity of urban habitats in conserving aquatic and terrestrial communities, as well as their linkages.

Landscape and Urban PlanningVol. 260
University of Zurich (CH), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Board of the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.