Abstract P3033: Determining Decision Thresholds For Physicians And Parents For Instituting A Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation Order For Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients – A Cross-Sectional Study Of Parents And Physicians In The United States

Introduction: Decision-making about resuscitating a critically ill child is complex but common. We aimed to study the survival thresholds at which a physician, compared to parents, decides to treat or withhold resuscitating a child. Moreover, we aimed to compare physicians' estimates of survival with the estimates calculated using data from a nationwide registry. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey-based study including parents and physicians in the United States. Clinical vignettes based on hypothetical survival probabilities were used to study and compare the decision thresholds for parents and physicians. Vignettes developed using the Get-With-The-Guidelines-Resuscitation registry were used to explore physicians’ decision thresholds and compare the physician-estimated survival with the survival from the data. Thresholds were determined for each vignette using mixed-effect logistic regression models. Results: A total of 167 parents and 43 physicians provided decisions for 501 and 257 vignettes respectively. The decision threshold for survival to discharge was 5.3% (95% CI: 3.7 to 7.0) for physicians and 1.2% (95% CI: -0.8 to 3.0) for parents. Whereas the decision threshold for survival to discharge with PCPC 1 or 2 was 3.5% (95% CI: 1.1 to 7.1) for physicians and 0.6% (95% CI: -1.2 to 1.8) for parents. Physicians overestimated the likelihood of survival. About 58% estimated a higher survival than that predicted by the multivariate model. The Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation threshold based on physician-estimated survival probability was 13% and the threshold based on model-based probability was 5.3%, the same as the one calculated using hypothetical survival probabilities. Conclusions: Using the model-based and hypothetical probability of survival, we estimated the decision threshold for physicians and parents to be 5.3% and 1.2% respectively. This illustrates that parents still want to attempt resuscitation at a survival probability where physicians would recommend withholding the resuscitation. These findings have implications for clinical practice and counseling the parents of critically ill hospitalized children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.p3033
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract P3033: Determining Decision Thresholds For Physicians And Parents For Instituting A Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation Order For Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients – A Cross-Sectional Study Of Parents And Physicians In The United States

Ye Shen, Minaz Mawani, Mark H. Ebell, Bryan McNally et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract P3033: Determining Decision Thresholds For Physicians And Parents For Instituting A Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation Order For Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients – A Cross-Sectional Study Of Parents And Physicians In The United States

Ye Shen, Minaz Mawani, Mark H. Ebell, Bryan McNally, Jessica Knight
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Decision-making about resuscitating a critically ill child is complex but common. We aimed to study the survival thresholds at which a physician, compared to parents, decides to treat or withhold resuscitating a child. Moreover, we aimed to compare physicians' estimates of survival with the estimates calculated using data from a nationwide registry. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey-based study including parents and physicians in the United States. Clinical vignettes based on hypothetical survival probabilities were used to study and compare the decision thresholds for parents and physicians. Vignettes developed using the Get-With-The-Guidelines-Resuscitation registry were used to explore physicians’ decision thresholds and compare the physician-estimated survival with the survival from the data. Thresholds were determined for each vignette using mixed-effect logistic regression models. Results: A total of 167 parents and 43 physicians provided decisions for 501 and 257 vignettes respectively. The decision threshold for survival to discharge was 5.3% (95% CI: 3.7 to 7.0) for physicians and 1.2% (95% CI: -0.8 to 3.0) for parents. Whereas the decision threshold for survival to discharge with PCPC 1 or 2 was 3.5% (95% CI: 1.1 to 7.1) for physicians and 0.6% (95% CI: -1.2 to 1.8) for parents. Physicians overestimated the likelihood of survival. About 58% estimated a higher survival than that predicted by the multivariate model. The Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation threshold based on physician-estimated survival probability was 13% and the threshold based on model-based probability was 5.3%, the same as the one calculated using hypothetical survival probabilities. Conclusions: Using the model-based and hypothetical probability of survival, we estimated the decision threshold for physicians and parents to be 5.3% and 1.2% respectively. This illustrates that parents still want to attempt resuscitation at a survival probability where physicians would recommend withholding the resuscitation. These findings have implications for clinical practice and counseling the parents of critically ill hospitalized children.

CirculationVol. 151(Suppl_1)
University of Vermont (US), Emory University (US), University of Georgia (US), Green Tech Labs (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.