Abstract P1099: A Daily Diary Examination of the Associations of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Anticipated Discrimination, and Blood Pressure among Sexual and Gender Minority Adults

Background: Chronic psychosocial stressors, such as anticipated discrimination and adverse childhood experiences, have been shown to influence hypertension risk among stigmatized adults. Emerging research suggests that individuals exposed to adverse childhood experiences later report greater discrimination as adults. Researchers theorize that exposure to adverse childhood experiences likely moderate the association between discrimination and blood pressure (BP); however, this remains underexplored. Therefore, we sought to examine whether adverse childhood experiences moderated the associations of anticipated discrimination and BP in a diverse sample of adults. Methods: Data were obtained from a 30-day online diary study of sexual and gender minority (SGM; e.g., gay/lesbian, bisexual, transgender) adults in the United States. Participants completed daily electronic diaries that assessed anticipated discrimination every morning. Home BP was assessed every day at awakening and before bedtime. Adverse childhood experiences, including childhood physical, emotional, and sexual abuse, were assessed at baseline using a validated questionnaire. Mixed-effects linear models, adjusted for demographic factors, estimated the associations between daily anticipated discrimination and BP and the moderating role of adverse childhood experiences. Results: The sample included 31 SGM adults with a mean age of 27.1 years (±7.50). Approximately 83% of participants were Latinx and 49% were multiracial. We found that 39% of the sample reported exposure to 4 or more adverse childhood experiences. Results of mixed-effects linear models suggested that daily anticipated discrimination was not significantly associated with BP. However, we did find evidence that childhood physical abuse significantly strengthened the association between daily anticipated discrimination and morning diastolic BP (β(SE) = 2.36 (0.88), p = 0.01). Childhood emotional and sexual abuse were not significant moderators. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of considering the moderating effects of adverse childhood experiences on the association between daily anticipated discrimination and BP among SGM people. Future research is needed with larger samples to understand the role that adverse childhood experiences (particularly childhood physical abuse) may play in sensitizing individuals to greater exposure to psychosocial stress and subsequent hypertension risk in adulthood.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.p1099
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract P1099: A Daily Diary Examination of the Associations of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Anticipated Discrimination, and Blood Pressure among Sexual and Gender Minority Adults

Billy A. Caceres, Lauren Bochicchio, Lisa Pardee
Circulation
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Abstract P1099: A Daily Diary Examination of the Associations of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Anticipated Discrimination, and Blood Pressure among Sexual and Gender Minority Adults

Billy A. Caceres, Lauren Bochicchio, Lisa Pardee
article en

Abstract

Background: Chronic psychosocial stressors, such as anticipated discrimination and adverse childhood experiences, have been shown to influence hypertension risk among stigmatized adults. Emerging research suggests that individuals exposed to adverse childhood experiences later report greater discrimination as adults. Researchers theorize that exposure to adverse childhood experiences likely moderate the association between discrimination and blood pressure (BP); however, this remains underexplored. Therefore, we sought to examine whether adverse childhood experiences moderated the associations of anticipated discrimination and BP in a diverse sample of adults. Methods: Data were obtained from a 30-day online diary study of sexual and gender minority (SGM; e.g., gay/lesbian, bisexual, transgender) adults in the United States. Participants completed daily electronic diaries that assessed anticipated discrimination every morning. Home BP was assessed every day at awakening and before bedtime. Adverse childhood experiences, including childhood physical, emotional, and sexual abuse, were assessed at baseline using a validated questionnaire. Mixed-effects linear models, adjusted for demographic factors, estimated the associations between daily anticipated discrimination and BP and the moderating role of adverse childhood experiences. Results: The sample included 31 SGM adults with a mean age of 27.1 years (±7.50). Approximately 83% of participants were Latinx and 49% were multiracial. We found that 39% of the sample reported exposure to 4 or more adverse childhood experiences. Results of mixed-effects linear models suggested that daily anticipated discrimination was not significantly associated with BP. However, we did find evidence that childhood physical abuse significantly strengthened the association between daily anticipated discrimination and morning diastolic BP (β(SE) = 2.36 (0.88), p = 0.01). Childhood emotional and sexual abuse were not significant moderators. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of considering the moderating effects of adverse childhood experiences on the association between daily anticipated discrimination and BP among SGM people. Future research is needed with larger samples to understand the role that adverse childhood experiences (particularly childhood physical abuse) may play in sensitizing individuals to greater exposure to psychosocial stress and subsequent hypertension risk in adulthood.

CirculationVol. 151(Suppl_1)
Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.