Abstract P2072: Lipoprotein(a) Levels in Premature Versus Non-Premature Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a causal, predominantly genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Approximately 20-30% of the global population have Lp(a) levels in the atherogenic range, with prospective data demonstrating a dose-response association of Lp(a) levels with ASCVD risk. However, there are relatively limited data characterizing the relationship between Lp(a) and premature ASCVD in epidemiologic cohort studies. Methods: We evaluated participants in the ARIC study with available Lp(a) measurements, collected at ARIC Visit 4 (1996-98). We used continuous follow-up and adjudication for ASCVD events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, or ischemic stroke) from 1987 through 2021 to categorize participants as having had premature ASCVD events (events by age <55 for men, <65 for women), non-premature ASCVD events (age ≥55 for men, ≥65 for women), or no ASCVD events. Lp(a) levels were categorized according to previously established cutpoints: <30, ≥30 to <50, ≥50 to <100, and ≥100 mg/dL and compared across those with non-premature ASCVD, premature ASCVD, and no ASCVD. Elevated Lp(a) was defined as ≥30 mg/dL, and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the association of elevated Lp(a) with ASCVD status. Results: Among 8,236 participants (mean age 58 yrs, 71% female, 24% Black adults), those with premature ASCVD had the highest median Lp(a) levels (17.7 mg/dL), followed by non-premature ASCVD (14.4 mg/dL), and no ASCVD (13.6 mg/dL) (p = 0.002) ( Table ). Elevated Lp(a) levels were found in 40.8% of participants with premature ASCVD, compared with 34.1% in non-premature ASCVD, and 30.8% without ASCVD (p <0.001). Participants with premature ASCVD had the highest odds of elevated Lp(a) relative to those with no ASCVD (OR: 1.39 [95% CI: 1.09-1.77]), while participants with non-premature ASCVD had a lesser, but still significantly higher odds of elevated Lp(a), compared to those with no ASCVD (OR: 1.16 [1.02-1.31]). Conclusion: Among ARIC study participants, premature ASCVD is associated with the highest prevalence and odds of elevated Lp(a). These findings reinforce the importance of the broader adoption of current guidelines that recommend systematic screening for elevated Lp(a) among individuals with premature ASCVD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.p2072
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract P2072: Lipoprotein(a) Levels in Premature Versus Non-Premature Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

Salim S. Virani, Chiadi E. Ndumele, Seth S. Martin, Eric Boerwinkle et al.
2 links
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract P2072: Lipoprotein(a) Levels in Premature Versus Non-Premature Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

Salim S. Virani, Chiadi E. Ndumele, Seth S. Martin, Eric Boerwinkle, Josef Coresh, Ron Cornelis Hoogeveen, Christie Mitchell Ballantyne, Matthew J. Belanger, Jelani Grant, Kunihiro Matsushita, Roger S. Blumenthal, Sui Zhang
article en

Abstract

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a causal, predominantly genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Approximately 20-30% of the global population have Lp(a) levels in the atherogenic range, with prospective data demonstrating a dose-response association of Lp(a) levels with ASCVD risk. However, there are relatively limited data characterizing the relationship between Lp(a) and premature ASCVD in epidemiologic cohort studies. Methods: We evaluated participants in the ARIC study with available Lp(a) measurements, collected at ARIC Visit 4 (1996-98). We used continuous follow-up and adjudication for ASCVD events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, or ischemic stroke) from 1987 through 2021 to categorize participants as having had premature ASCVD events (events by age <55 for men, <65 for women), non-premature ASCVD events (age ≥55 for men, ≥65 for women), or no ASCVD events. Lp(a) levels were categorized according to previously established cutpoints: <30, ≥30 to <50, ≥50 to <100, and ≥100 mg/dL and compared across those with non-premature ASCVD, premature ASCVD, and no ASCVD. Elevated Lp(a) was defined as ≥30 mg/dL, and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the association of elevated Lp(a) with ASCVD status. Results: Among 8,236 participants (mean age 58 yrs, 71% female, 24% Black adults), those with premature ASCVD had the highest median Lp(a) levels (17.7 mg/dL), followed by non-premature ASCVD (14.4 mg/dL), and no ASCVD (13.6 mg/dL) (p = 0.002) ( Table ). Elevated Lp(a) levels were found in 40.8% of participants with premature ASCVD, compared with 34.1% in non-premature ASCVD, and 30.8% without ASCVD (p <0.001). Participants with premature ASCVD had the highest odds of elevated Lp(a) relative to those with no ASCVD (OR: 1.39 [95% CI: 1.09-1.77]), while participants with non-premature ASCVD had a lesser, but still significantly higher odds of elevated Lp(a), compared to those with no ASCVD (OR: 1.16 [1.02-1.31]). Conclusion: Among ARIC study participants, premature ASCVD is associated with the highest prevalence and odds of elevated Lp(a). These findings reinforce the importance of the broader adoption of current guidelines that recommend systematic screening for elevated Lp(a) among individuals with premature ASCVD.

CirculationVol. 151(Suppl_1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.