Unravelling Protein–Fungal Hyphae Interactions at the Nanoscale

Fungal hyphae have demonstrated their importance in developing environmentally friendly, multiscale, composite assemblies where animal-derived proteins have been predominantly used as binders. Now, an ongoing challenge is to replace those high-performance animal protein binders with ecofriendly, plant-based alternatives. While the majority of studies have focused on the binding implied by rheological observations, relatively little is known about how such animal proteins bind to hyphal surfaces at nanometric length scales, and this knowledge is required to replace animal-derived binders with plant protein alternatives. Here, we decode intermolecular interactions of plant protein-based binders such as potato protein (<i>PoP)</i> to fungal (<i>Fusarium venenatum</i><i>)</i> hyphae in comparison to a classic animal protein-based binder (egg white protein, <i>EWP</i>) using a suite of theoretical and experimental approaches. Self-consistent field calculations modeling fungal hyphae as weakly hydrophobic, parallel cylinders predicted differences in the interaction potentials between the model protein layers, showing that <i>EWP</i> had an attractive potential across a broad range of conditions, in contrast to <i>PoP</i> that was mainly repulsive. Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy of protein-coated fungal hyphae confirmed that <i>EWP</i> delivers a uniform and complete coverage, while <i>PoP</i> naturally aggregates, resulting in more patchy coverage. Experimental interaction forces were measured using colloidal probe atomic force microscopy, confirming the influence of non-Coulombic forces particularly dominating in <i>PoP</i>, and attractive forces in <i>EWP</i>, further differentiating their respective binding mechanisms. Collectively, this multimethodological study provides a first-hand molecular explanation of the weaker hyphal-binding properties of aggregated plant proteins at the nanoscale, consistent with the previously reported macroscale observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5c01064
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Biochemical and Structural Characterization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unravelling Protein–Fungal Hyphae Interactions at the Nanoscale

Rammile Ettelaie, Ruth Hughes, Brent S. Murray, Mary C. Okeudo-Cogan et al.
2 citations
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Biochemical and Structural Characterization
1.61
article

Unravelling Protein–Fungal Hyphae Interactions at the Nanoscale

Rammile Ettelaie, Ruth Hughes, Brent S. Murray, Mary C. Okeudo-Cogan, Michelle Peckham, Anwesha Sarkar, Simon D. Connell, Stewart J. Radford, Martin Fuller
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Fungal hyphae have demonstrated their importance in developing environmentally friendly, multiscale, composite assemblies where animal-derived proteins have been predominantly used as binders. Now, an ongoing challenge is to replace those high-performance animal protein binders with ecofriendly, plant-based alternatives. While the majority of studies have focused on the binding implied by rheological observations, relatively little is known about how such animal proteins bind to hyphal surfaces at nanometric length scales, and this knowledge is required to replace animal-derived binders with plant protein alternatives. Here, we decode intermolecular interactions of plant protein-based binders such as potato protein (<i>PoP)</i> to fungal (<i>Fusarium venenatum</i><i>)</i> hyphae in comparison to a classic animal protein-based binder (egg white protein, <i>EWP</i>) using a suite of theoretical and experimental approaches. Self-consistent field calculations modeling fungal hyphae as weakly hydrophobic, parallel cylinders predicted differences in the interaction potentials between the model protein layers, showing that <i>EWP</i> had an attractive potential across a broad range of conditions, in contrast to <i>PoP</i> that was mainly repulsive. Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy of protein-coated fungal hyphae confirmed that <i>EWP</i> delivers a uniform and complete coverage, while <i>PoP</i> naturally aggregates, resulting in more patchy coverage. Experimental interaction forces were measured using colloidal probe atomic force microscopy, confirming the influence of non-Coulombic forces particularly dominating in <i>PoP</i>, and attractive forces in <i>EWP</i>, further differentiating their respective binding mechanisms. Collectively, this multimethodological study provides a first-hand molecular explanation of the weaker hyphal-binding properties of aggregated plant proteins at the nanoscale, consistent with the previously reported macroscale observations.

ACS Applied Materials & InterfacesVol. 17(20)
University of Leeds (GB), Quorn (United Kingdom) (GB), Faculty (United Kingdom) (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Innovate UK
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Biochemical and Structural Characterization
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.