An international systematic review of the ICF in education: cross-language comparisons from Chinese, German, Italian, and Portuguese publications
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), established by the World Health Organization (WHO), provides a biopsychosocial framework for understanding and addressing human functioning and disability. This systematic review examines the application of the ICF in educational contexts across four non-English languages: Chinese, German, Italian, and Portuguese. The findings reveal significant cross-cultural and linguistic variations in interpretation and implementation, shaped by each country’s socio-political, historical, and educational landscape. By analyzing 54 peer-reviewed publications, this review identifies key practical applications of the ICF in fostering inclusive educational practices. The study highlights how the ICF has influenced a shift from medicalized models of disability toward holistic, participation-centered approaches. Specifically, the ICF is used in Chinese literature to guide activity-based assessments in special education, in German studies as a broad theoretical framework, and in Italian and Portuguese research as a practical tool for inclusive education in mainstream settings. Despite its potential, challenges remain in cross-cultural integration, including inconsistencies in adoption and the need for deeper application beyond theoretical references. To enhance the ICF’s impact in education, this review underscores the necessity for training, cross-cultural collaboration, and policy refinement. Strengthening educators’ and policymakers’ understanding of ICF principles can facilitate its integration into mainstream education, ensuring a more inclusive and supportive learning environment for students with disabilities and those requiring additional support.
Authors
- Lin-Ju Kang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7818-6077)
- Alida Naudé (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3618-6551)
- Raphael Zahnd (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6444-2479)
- Linjun Shi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9771-604X)
- André Dionísio Rocha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0874-7099)
- Ines Alves (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-8696)
- Michelle Proyer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0100-7154)
- Juan Bornman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9685-3750)
- Marta Moretti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4705-6442)
- Gregor Maxwell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0473-2757)
Institutions
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
- Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (BR)
- Chang Gung University (TW)
- University of Luxembourg (LU)
- Stellenbosch University (ZA)
- FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (CH)
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
- Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate (NO)
- Zurich University of Teacher Education (CH)
- University of Bangui (CF)
- Tianjin Medical University (CN)
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Education
- Published
- 2025-04-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1526194
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.89