An international systematic review of the ICF in education: cross-language comparisons from Chinese, German, Italian, and Portuguese publications

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), established by the World Health Organization (WHO), provides a biopsychosocial framework for understanding and addressing human functioning and disability. This systematic review examines the application of the ICF in educational contexts across four non-English languages: Chinese, German, Italian, and Portuguese. The findings reveal significant cross-cultural and linguistic variations in interpretation and implementation, shaped by each country’s socio-political, historical, and educational landscape. By analyzing 54 peer-reviewed publications, this review identifies key practical applications of the ICF in fostering inclusive educational practices. The study highlights how the ICF has influenced a shift from medicalized models of disability toward holistic, participation-centered approaches. Specifically, the ICF is used in Chinese literature to guide activity-based assessments in special education, in German studies as a broad theoretical framework, and in Italian and Portuguese research as a practical tool for inclusive education in mainstream settings. Despite its potential, challenges remain in cross-cultural integration, including inconsistencies in adoption and the need for deeper application beyond theoretical references. To enhance the ICF’s impact in education, this review underscores the necessity for training, cross-cultural collaboration, and policy refinement. Strengthening educators’ and policymakers’ understanding of ICF principles can facilitate its integration into mainstream education, ensuring a more inclusive and supportive learning environment for students with disabilities and those requiring additional support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1526194
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An international systematic review of the ICF in education: cross-language comparisons from Chinese, German, Italian, and Portuguese publications

Lin-Ju Kang, Alida Naudé, Raphael Zahnd, Linjun Shi et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Education
Educational and Psychological Assessments
6.89
article

An international systematic review of the ICF in education: cross-language comparisons from Chinese, German, Italian, and Portuguese publications

Lin-Ju Kang, Alida Naudé, Raphael Zahnd, Linjun Shi, André Dionísio Rocha, Ines Alves, Michelle Proyer, Juan Bornman, Marta Moretti, Gregor Maxwell
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), established by the World Health Organization (WHO), provides a biopsychosocial framework for understanding and addressing human functioning and disability. This systematic review examines the application of the ICF in educational contexts across four non-English languages: Chinese, German, Italian, and Portuguese. The findings reveal significant cross-cultural and linguistic variations in interpretation and implementation, shaped by each country’s socio-political, historical, and educational landscape. By analyzing 54 peer-reviewed publications, this review identifies key practical applications of the ICF in fostering inclusive educational practices. The study highlights how the ICF has influenced a shift from medicalized models of disability toward holistic, participation-centered approaches. Specifically, the ICF is used in Chinese literature to guide activity-based assessments in special education, in German studies as a broad theoretical framework, and in Italian and Portuguese research as a practical tool for inclusive education in mainstream settings. Despite its potential, challenges remain in cross-cultural integration, including inconsistencies in adoption and the need for deeper application beyond theoretical references. To enhance the ICF’s impact in education, this review underscores the necessity for training, cross-cultural collaboration, and policy refinement. Strengthening educators’ and policymakers’ understanding of ICF principles can facilitate its integration into mainstream education, ensuring a more inclusive and supportive learning environment for students with disabilities and those requiring additional support.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (BR), Chang Gung University (TW), University of Luxembourg (LU), Stellenbosch University (ZA), FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (CH), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate (NO), Zurich University of Teacher Education (CH), University of Bangui (CF), Tianjin Medical University (CN), UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
6.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.