Patients' Perceptions and Preferences on the Choice of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Management in the United Kingdom

ABSTRACT This study aimed to understand participants' experiences with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and to evaluate their preferences regarding treatment options. Individuals in the United Kingdom with a diagnosis of prostate cancer and experience with ADT were enroled in either a qualitative survey conducted via online video teleconferencing or a quantitative cross‐sectional online survey. The qualitative survey examined participants' perspectives on ADT, while the quantitative survey included an anchored maximum difference scaling (MaxDiff) analysis to identify treatment preferences based on 11 attributes associated with ADT. Additionally, participants completed a treatment preference exercise where they were asked to rank five blinded treatment profiles (based on existing ADT products), each containing eight ADT attributes. Nineteen participants were included in the qualitative survey and nine key themes were identified, including challenges associated with ADT side effects, the value of clinical nurse specialists and patient support groups, and the need for greater patient involvement in treatment decisions. Forty‐eight participants completed the quantitative survey, with the MaxDiff analysis revealing that participants considered multiple attributes when selecting an ADT, such as treatment establishment, route of administration, and speed of testosterone recovery after treatment cessation. When presented with blinded treatment options, 63% of participants selected relugolix as their first‐choice treatment, primarily due to its oral route of administration, although other attributes also influenced their decision. This study highlights the substantial burden of ADT on individuals' lives and their desire to participate in treatment decision‐making. When selecting a treatment, participants consider multiple attributes to be important. Assuming comparable efficacy and safety profiles across products, participants prioritised factors such as treatment establishment and route of administration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trends in Urology & Men s Health
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/tre.12004
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients' Perceptions and Preferences on the Choice of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Management in the United Kingdom

Heather Payne, Amit K. Bahl, Claire Jackson, Gabriel Abbam et al.
1 links
Trends in Urology & Men s Health
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Patients' Perceptions and Preferences on the Choice of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer Management in the United Kingdom

Heather Payne, Amit K. Bahl, Claire Jackson, Gabriel Abbam, Simon Cheesman, Stephen Allen, Marc Rabbani
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aimed to understand participants' experiences with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and to evaluate their preferences regarding treatment options. Individuals in the United Kingdom with a diagnosis of prostate cancer and experience with ADT were enroled in either a qualitative survey conducted via online video teleconferencing or a quantitative cross‐sectional online survey. The qualitative survey examined participants' perspectives on ADT, while the quantitative survey included an anchored maximum difference scaling (MaxDiff) analysis to identify treatment preferences based on 11 attributes associated with ADT. Additionally, participants completed a treatment preference exercise where they were asked to rank five blinded treatment profiles (based on existing ADT products), each containing eight ADT attributes. Nineteen participants were included in the qualitative survey and nine key themes were identified, including challenges associated with ADT side effects, the value of clinical nurse specialists and patient support groups, and the need for greater patient involvement in treatment decisions. Forty‐eight participants completed the quantitative survey, with the MaxDiff analysis revealing that participants considered multiple attributes when selecting an ADT, such as treatment establishment, route of administration, and speed of testosterone recovery after treatment cessation. When presented with blinded treatment options, 63% of participants selected relugolix as their first‐choice treatment, primarily due to its oral route of administration, although other attributes also influenced their decision. This study highlights the substantial burden of ADT on individuals' lives and their desire to participate in treatment decision‐making. When selecting a treatment, participants consider multiple attributes to be important. Assuming comparable efficacy and safety profiles across products, participants prioritised factors such as treatment establishment and route of administration.

Trends in Urology & Men s HealthVol. 16(2)
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Royal London Hospital (GB), Accord (United Kingdom) (GB), Insight Healthcare (GB), Prostate Cancer UK (GB), Patient Advocate Foundation (US), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.