APPROACHES TO DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGE IN FRAUDCOMMITTED IN THE SPHERE OF MONETARY AND CREDIT RELATIONS

The article is devoted to the problem of determining the amount of damage in fraud in the field of crediting, which is topical for judicial and investigative practice. The authors explain the diversity of approaches to the understanding of damage in embezzlement structures by the confusion of two meanings of the term “damage”: damage as a feature of the structure and damage as harm (losses) caused to the victim as a result of committing a criminal offense, where the first affects the qualification of the deed, and the second - on the amount of recovery in favor of the victim. Taking into account the specific features of fraud in the field of lending, the authors propose to understand under the damage for the purposes of qualification the real damage caused by a criminal offense, equal to the amount of the principal debt under a bank loan agreement, while the remuneration due to the bank (lost profit) should not be taken into account.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Academy of Justice
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63546/3005-2246.2024.7.3.008
Primary Topic
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

APPROACHES TO DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGE IN FRAUDCOMMITTED IN THE SPHERE OF MONETARY AND CREDIT RELATIONS

А.М. Kalguzhinova, Ardak BIEBAYEVA
Bulletin of the Academy of Justice
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
article

APPROACHES TO DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGE IN FRAUDCOMMITTED IN THE SPHERE OF MONETARY AND CREDIT RELATIONS

А.М. Kalguzhinova, Ardak BIEBAYEVA
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of determining the amount of damage in fraud in the field of crediting, which is topical for judicial and investigative practice. The authors explain the diversity of approaches to the understanding of damage in embezzlement structures by the confusion of two meanings of the term “damage”: damage as a feature of the structure and damage as harm (losses) caused to the victim as a result of committing a criminal offense, where the first affects the qualification of the deed, and the second - on the amount of recovery in favor of the victim. Taking into account the specific features of fraud in the field of lending, the authors propose to understand under the damage for the purposes of qualification the real damage caused by a criminal offense, equal to the amount of the principal debt under a bank loan agreement, while the remuneration due to the bank (lost profit) should not be taken into account.

Bulletin of the Academy of JusticeVol. 7(3)
Karaganda Buketov University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

APPROACHES TO DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGE IN FRAUDCOMMITTED IN THE SPHERE OF MONETARY AND CREDIT RELATIONS — А.М. Kalguzhinova, Ardak BIEBAYEVA · Bulletin of the Academy of Justice (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS