ANALYSING NUCLEAR LATENCY: VARIABLES AND CONSTANTS

The article discusses the role of variables and constants in analysing the nuclear factor in world politics, in particular, the so-called threshold states and their behaviour. In a brief section devoted to terminology, definitions of the corresponding notions are given. A literature review makes it possible to single out various approaches to utilising the mentioned terms in studying the nuclear latency phenomenon in different IRT (International Relations Theory) schools as well as the existing gaps. While choosing nuclear latency per se as a dependent, measurable variable, the work features an account of independent variables as well as constants that have an impact on threshold states’ policies in the nuclear realm. Among the independent variables the following are presented: global context (international milieu), domestic political situation, as well as political will of the decision-makers, the latter largely being a function of the previous two components. The first variable is an external one whereas the second and third ones belong to internal variables. Such indicators as credibility of positive security assurances and power asymmetry are at the interface of the internal and external variables. Constants, in turn, include the current status of nuclear technologies at a national level, as well as the nuclear non-proliferation regime. Defining the listed values allows one to adequately explain the choices of threshold states in favour of retaining a highly developed NFC (nuclear fuel cycle) while simultaneously successfully attempting to attain additional security guarantees from the NWS (nuclear-weapon state) responsible for providing its “nuclear umbrella”. To validate his theoretical theses, the author resorts to the case studies from the Asia-Pacific threshold states (Commonwealth of Australia, Japan, and Republic of Korea). An inference is presented regarding the ambivalent nature of nuclear latency as a state, which can be viewed from different angles both as a variable and even as a constant that influences security politics at national, regional and global scales.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Filosofiya Sotsiologiya Politologiya
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863x/83/21
Primary Topic
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALYSING NUCLEAR LATENCY: VARIABLES AND CONSTANTS

Gleb V. Toropchin
Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Filosofiya Sotsiologiya Politologiya
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
article

ANALYSING NUCLEAR LATENCY: VARIABLES AND CONSTANTS

Gleb V. Toropchin
article en

Abstract

The article discusses the role of variables and constants in analysing the nuclear factor in world politics, in particular, the so-called threshold states and their behaviour. In a brief section devoted to terminology, definitions of the corresponding notions are given. A literature review makes it possible to single out various approaches to utilising the mentioned terms in studying the nuclear latency phenomenon in different IRT (International Relations Theory) schools as well as the existing gaps. While choosing nuclear latency per se as a dependent, measurable variable, the work features an account of independent variables as well as constants that have an impact on threshold states’ policies in the nuclear realm. Among the independent variables the following are presented: global context (international milieu), domestic political situation, as well as political will of the decision-makers, the latter largely being a function of the previous two components. The first variable is an external one whereas the second and third ones belong to internal variables. Such indicators as credibility of positive security assurances and power asymmetry are at the interface of the internal and external variables. Constants, in turn, include the current status of nuclear technologies at a national level, as well as the nuclear non-proliferation regime. Defining the listed values allows one to adequately explain the choices of threshold states in favour of retaining a highly developed NFC (nuclear fuel cycle) while simultaneously successfully attempting to attain additional security guarantees from the NWS (nuclear-weapon state) responsible for providing its “nuclear umbrella”. To validate his theoretical theses, the author resorts to the case studies from the Asia-Pacific threshold states (Commonwealth of Australia, Japan, and Republic of Korea). An inference is presented regarding the ambivalent nature of nuclear latency as a state, which can be viewed from different angles both as a variable and even as a constant that influences security politics at national, regional and global scales.

Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Filosofiya Sotsiologiya Politologiya(83)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.