Optimization of bend flow characteristics using multi-objective evaluation and numerical simulation

Rough-strip energy dissipators (R-SEDs) are commonly used as auxiliary engineering measures due to their simple designs and ease of construction. R-SEDs at the bottom of curved drainage channels can achieve flow diversion and velocity reduction. This study comprehensively selected six arrangement parameters affecting the effect of R-SED flow diversion and velocity reduction (i.e., angle θ, height ratio λ, relative height h, spacing s, thickness δ, and length L of R-SEDs). Six-factor three-level orthogonal tests were performed. A multi-criteria evaluation system was developed with the coefficients of variation of water surface transverse slope (CW) and the coefficients of variation of average flow velocity (CV) as the sub-evaluation indexes and the combined weighting coefficient (SS) as the combined evaluation index. In addition, R-SED arrangement parameters were optimized. The results show that the importance of factors affecting flow diversion, velocity reduction, and overall effects of R-SEDs were ranked in descending order: θ > λ > δ > L > h > s, h > L > θ > δ > λ > s, and h > θ > L > δ > λ > s, respectively. The preferred R-SED arrangement was as follows: h = 0.4, λ = 1.0, s = 5 m, θ = 60°, δ = (1/10)w, and L = 0.2w. Under the preferred combination, R-SEDs achieved better overall flow diversion and velocity reduction performance. CV (0.501) decreased by 29.54% and 18.93% compared with those under no R-SED and the optimum condition in the orthogonal test (run 9), respectively. CW (0.285) decreased by 47.12% and 8.37% compared with those under no R-SED and run 9, respectively. SS (0.959) was 107.58% and 11.12% higher than those under no R-SED and run 9, respectively. The findings can provide insights for studying bend flow energy dissipators.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0267258
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of bend flow characteristics using multi-objective evaluation and numerical simulation

Zhenwei Mu, Honghong Zhang, Hao Ma, Rongshuang Sun et al.
1 citations
Physics of Fluids
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
1.33
article

Optimization of bend flow characteristics using multi-objective evaluation and numerical simulation

Zhenwei Mu, Honghong Zhang, Hao Ma, Rongshuang Sun, Yufei Gong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Rough-strip energy dissipators (R-SEDs) are commonly used as auxiliary engineering measures due to their simple designs and ease of construction. R-SEDs at the bottom of curved drainage channels can achieve flow diversion and velocity reduction. This study comprehensively selected six arrangement parameters affecting the effect of R-SED flow diversion and velocity reduction (i.e., angle θ, height ratio λ, relative height h, spacing s, thickness δ, and length L of R-SEDs). Six-factor three-level orthogonal tests were performed. A multi-criteria evaluation system was developed with the coefficients of variation of water surface transverse slope (CW) and the coefficients of variation of average flow velocity (CV) as the sub-evaluation indexes and the combined weighting coefficient (SS) as the combined evaluation index. In addition, R-SED arrangement parameters were optimized. The results show that the importance of factors affecting flow diversion, velocity reduction, and overall effects of R-SEDs were ranked in descending order: θ > λ > δ > L > h > s, h > L > θ > δ > λ > s, and h > θ > L > δ > λ > s, respectively. The preferred R-SED arrangement was as follows: h = 0.4, λ = 1.0, s = 5 m, θ = 60°, δ = (1/10)w, and L = 0.2w. Under the preferred combination, R-SEDs achieved better overall flow diversion and velocity reduction performance. CV (0.501) decreased by 29.54% and 18.93% compared with those under no R-SED and the optimum condition in the orthogonal test (run 9), respectively. CW (0.285) decreased by 47.12% and 8.37% compared with those under no R-SED and run 9, respectively. SS (0.959) was 107.58% and 11.12% higher than those under no R-SED and run 9, respectively. The findings can provide insights for studying bend flow energy dissipators.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(4)
Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Province, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimization of bend flow characteristics using multi-objective evaluation and numerical simulation — Zhenwei Mu, Honghong Zhang, et al. · Physics of Fluids (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS