The phase-seeding method for solving non-centrosymmetric crystal structures: a challenge for artificial intelligence

The overall crystallographic process involves acquiring experimental data and using crystallographic software to find the structure solution. Unfortunately, while diffracted intensities can be measured, the corresponding phases - needed to determine atomic positions - remain experimentally inaccessible (phase problem). Direct methods and the Patterson approach have been successful in solving crystal structures but face limitations with large structures or low-resolution data. Current artificial intelligence (AI) based approaches, such as those recently developed by Larsen et al. [Science (2024), 385, 522-528], have been applied with success to solve centrosymmetric structures, where the phase is binary (0 or π). The current work proposes a new phasing method designed for AI integration, applicable also to non-centrosymmetric structures, where the phase is a continuous variable. The approach involves discretizing the initial phase values for non-centrosymmetric structures into a few distinct values (e.g. values corresponding to the four quadrants). This reduces the complex phase problem from a continuous regression task to a multi-class classification problem, where only a few phase seed values need to be determined. This discretization allows the use of a smaller training dataset for deep learning models, reducing computational complexity. Our feasibility study results show that this method can effectively solve small, medium and large structures, with the minimum percentage of phase seeds (three or four points in the interval [0, 2π]), and 10% to 30% of seed symmetry-independent reflections. This phase-seeding method has the potential to extend AI-based approaches to solve crystal structures ab initio, regardless of complexity or symmetry, by combining AI classification algorithms with classical phasing procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1107/s2053273325002797
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The phase-seeding method for solving non-centrosymmetric crystal structures: a challenge for artificial intelligence

Liberato De, Angela Altomare, Cinzia Giannini, Rocco Caliandro et al.
4 citations
Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances
Machine Learning in Materials Science
2.07
article

The phase-seeding method for solving non-centrosymmetric crystal structures: a challenge for artificial intelligence

Liberato De, Angela Altomare, Cinzia Giannini, Rocco Caliandro, Benedetta Carrozzini
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The overall crystallographic process involves acquiring experimental data and using crystallographic software to find the structure solution. Unfortunately, while diffracted intensities can be measured, the corresponding phases - needed to determine atomic positions - remain experimentally inaccessible (phase problem). Direct methods and the Patterson approach have been successful in solving crystal structures but face limitations with large structures or low-resolution data. Current artificial intelligence (AI) based approaches, such as those recently developed by Larsen et al. [Science (2024), 385, 522-528], have been applied with success to solve centrosymmetric structures, where the phase is binary (0 or π). The current work proposes a new phasing method designed for AI integration, applicable also to non-centrosymmetric structures, where the phase is a continuous variable. The approach involves discretizing the initial phase values for non-centrosymmetric structures into a few distinct values (e.g. values corresponding to the four quadrants). This reduces the complex phase problem from a continuous regression task to a multi-class classification problem, where only a few phase seed values need to be determined. This discretization allows the use of a smaller training dataset for deep learning models, reducing computational complexity. Our feasibility study results show that this method can effectively solve small, medium and large structures, with the minimum percentage of phase seeds (three or four points in the interval [0, 2π]), and 10% to 30% of seed symmetry-independent reflections. This phase-seeding method has the potential to extend AI-based approaches to solve crystal structures ab initio, regardless of complexity or symmetry, by combining AI classification algorithms with classical phasing procedures.

Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesVol. 81(3)
Institute of Crystallography (IT)
Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
2.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.