Corroboration in vivo mechanical strain distribution in soft tissues for pressure ulcer prevention: A comparative analysis between a simplified finite element analysis and experimental strain fields

Basic research into the aetiology of pressure ulcers suggests that the concentration of mechanical strain in biological soft tissues is critical to their development. Direct measurement of in vivo strain is not compatible with clinical routine. To overcome this problem, several finite element models (FEM) have been proposed by the biomechanical community to estimate strain from imaging data. However, no direct experimental validation of the underlying relationships between mechanical loading and soft tissue strain distribution predicted by the model has been performed, and such validation evidence must be obtained prior to any clinical evaluation. Building on the experimental results obtained in N = 10 healthy volunteers (Zappalá et al., 2024), the relevance of the modelling hypotheses of the finite element model proposed in this study, which is based on a simplified geometric representation of the ischial region (Macron et al., 2020), was investigated. A methodology was proposed to estimate the different parameters needed to construct the model from the available MRI masks. The FEM was then used to estimate in vivo compressive and shear strains. The resulting strains were then compared with experimental data. The results show that the model assumptions lead to an overall overestimation of the compressive and shear strains in the muscle tissue, especially directly under the ischial tuberosity. Similarly, the model underestimates the strain in adipose tissue (mean error in shear strain of -0.2). This study highlights the fact that the assumptions usually made for the geometric modelling of muscle tissue (homogeneous soft tissue layer) lead to an incorrect estimation of peak strain localisation. Further work should be done to improve the representation of muscle tissue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107017
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corroboration in vivo mechanical strain distribution in soft tissues for pressure ulcer prevention: A comparative analysis between a simplified finite element analysis and experimental strain fields

Giuseppe Sciumè, Pierre‐Yves Rohan, Stefano Zappalá, Hélène Pillet et al.
1 citations
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
5.77
article

Corroboration in vivo mechanical strain distribution in soft tissues for pressure ulcer prevention: A comparative analysis between a simplified finite element analysis and experimental strain fields

Giuseppe Sciumè, Pierre‐Yves Rohan, Stefano Zappalá, Hélène Pillet, Alexandre Segain
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Basic research into the aetiology of pressure ulcers suggests that the concentration of mechanical strain in biological soft tissues is critical to their development. Direct measurement of in vivo strain is not compatible with clinical routine. To overcome this problem, several finite element models (FEM) have been proposed by the biomechanical community to estimate strain from imaging data. However, no direct experimental validation of the underlying relationships between mechanical loading and soft tissue strain distribution predicted by the model has been performed, and such validation evidence must be obtained prior to any clinical evaluation. Building on the experimental results obtained in N = 10 healthy volunteers (Zappalá et al., 2024), the relevance of the modelling hypotheses of the finite element model proposed in this study, which is based on a simplified geometric representation of the ischial region (Macron et al., 2020), was investigated. A methodology was proposed to estimate the different parameters needed to construct the model from the available MRI masks. The FEM was then used to estimate in vivo compressive and shear strains. The resulting strains were then compared with experimental data. The results show that the model assumptions lead to an overall overestimation of the compressive and shear strains in the muscle tissue, especially directly under the ischial tuberosity. Similarly, the model underestimates the strain in adipose tissue (mean error in shear strain of -0.2). This study highlights the fact that the assumptions usually made for the geometric modelling of muscle tissue (homogeneous soft tissue layer) lead to an incorrect estimation of peak strain localisation. Further work should be done to improve the representation of muscle tissue.

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materialsVol. 168
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Arts et Métiers (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR), Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux (FR), HESAM Université (FR), Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR), Cardiff University (GB)
Fondation de l'Avenir pour la Recherche Médicale Appliquée
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
5.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.