Mediating colonial archives

The commentary on “Building better archival futures by recognizing epistemic injustice” by Charles Jeurgens begins to approach some of the ideas and concepts that he analyses, namely “epistemic justice” and, in special, “hermeneutical injustice”. Follows a mention to diverse researches and initiatives revisiting colonialism in Portugal and a critical mention on the extensive use of the term decolonisation applied, for instance, to the archives. The “myth of impartiality and neutrality” of the archivists deserves a specific attention, as well as the difficulties surrounding their practices’ transparency. The uniqueness of the colonial archives is questioned, in comparison with other archives equally demanding a rigorous study. Finally, doubts are raised on the role of archivists and archival institutions regarding the colonial archives as a matter of justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Boletim do Arquivo da Universidade de Coimbra
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-7974_38_1_8
Primary Topic
Colonialism, slavery, and trade
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mediating colonial archives

Ana Canas Delgado Martins
Boletim do Arquivo da Universidade de Coimbra
Colonialism, slavery, and trade
article

Mediating colonial archives

Ana Canas Delgado Martins
article en

Abstract

The commentary on “Building better archival futures by recognizing epistemic injustice” by Charles Jeurgens begins to approach some of the ideas and concepts that he analyses, namely “epistemic justice” and, in special, “hermeneutical injustice”. Follows a mention to diverse researches and initiatives revisiting colonialism in Portugal and a critical mention on the extensive use of the term decolonisation applied, for instance, to the archives. The “myth of impartiality and neutrality” of the archivists deserves a specific attention, as well as the difficulties surrounding their practices’ transparency. The uniqueness of the colonial archives is questioned, in comparison with other archives equally demanding a rigorous study. Finally, doubts are raised on the role of archivists and archival institutions regarding the colonial archives as a matter of justice.

Boletim do Arquivo da Universidade de CoimbraVol. 38(1)
Instituto de Historia (ES), Centro Interuniversitário de História das Ciências e da Tecnologia (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Colonialism, slavery, and trade
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mediating colonial archives — Ana Canas Delgado Martins · Boletim do Arquivo da Universidade de Coimbra (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS