Differences in psychologists’ cognitive traits are associated with scientific divides

Scientific research is often characterized by schools of thought. We investigate whether these divisions are associated with differences in researchers' cognitive traits such as tolerance for ambiguity. These differences may guide researchers to prefer different problems, tackle identical problems in different ways, and even reach different conclusions when studying the same problems in the same way. We surveyed 7,973 researchers in psychological sciences and investigated links between what they research, their stances on open questions in the field, and their cognitive traits and dispositions. Our results show that researchers' stances on scientific questions are associated with what they research and with their cognitive traits. Further, these associations are detectable in their publication histories. These findings support the idea that divisions in scientific fields reflect differences in the researchers themselves, hinting that some divisions may be more difficult to bridge than suggested by a traditional view of data-driven scientific consensus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02153-1
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in psychologists’ cognitive traits are associated with scientific divides

Elizabeth Pontikes, Justin Sulik, Nakwon Rim, James A. Evans et al.
4 citations
Nature Human Behaviour
Mental Health Research Topics
8.47
article

Differences in psychologists’ cognitive traits are associated with scientific divides

Elizabeth Pontikes, Justin Sulik, Nakwon Rim, James A. Evans, Gary Lupyan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Scientific research is often characterized by schools of thought. We investigate whether these divisions are associated with differences in researchers' cognitive traits such as tolerance for ambiguity. These differences may guide researchers to prefer different problems, tackle identical problems in different ways, and even reach different conclusions when studying the same problems in the same way. We surveyed 7,973 researchers in psychological sciences and investigated links between what they research, their stances on open questions in the field, and their cognitive traits and dispositions. Our results show that researchers' stances on scientific questions are associated with what they research and with their cognitive traits. Further, these associations are detectable in their publication histories. These findings support the idea that divisions in scientific fields reflect differences in the researchers themselves, hinting that some divisions may be more difficult to bridge than suggested by a traditional view of data-driven scientific consensus.

Nature Human BehaviourVol. 9(6)
Google (United States) (US), Santa Fe Institute (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Chicago (US), Nanosystems Initiative Munich (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), University of California, Davis (US)
John Templeton Foundation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Mental Health Research Topics
8.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Differences in psychologists’ cognitive traits are associated with scientific divides — Elizabeth Pontikes, Justin Sulik, et al. · Nature Human Behaviour (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS