Uncovering the “Quality of Indigence”

By tracing the colonial origins and the social usages of an administrative document (the <i>certificat d’indigence)</i>, this article argues that, in late colonial Upper-Volta and French West Africa, the “quality of indigence” served as both a bureaucratic device and a category for policing work and vulnerability. First, it was a device used by the colonial administration to hide haphazard and inchoate decision-making processes through mechanisms that appeared equitable. This had the effect of stifling the implementation of new social legislation. Secondly, the administrative mechanisms through which administrators validated indigence status reveal the bureaucratic continuities of interwar period <i>commandement</i>. Using the “quality of indigence,” allowed the administration surveil people who were not present in the administrative records. In the interstices of these often arbitrary decisions, at this time of imperial reconfiguration in the 1950s, claimants navigated these bureaucratic processes, by fashioning and framing their wealth or lack thereof, strategically, to signal their eligibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African Economic History
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3368/aeh.52.2.99
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering the “Quality of Indigence”

Thomas Zuber
African Economic History
Law in Society and Culture
article

Uncovering the “Quality of Indigence”

Thomas Zuber
article en

Abstract

By tracing the colonial origins and the social usages of an administrative document (the <i>certificat d’indigence)</i>, this article argues that, in late colonial Upper-Volta and French West Africa, the “quality of indigence” served as both a bureaucratic device and a category for policing work and vulnerability. First, it was a device used by the colonial administration to hide haphazard and inchoate decision-making processes through mechanisms that appeared equitable. This had the effect of stifling the implementation of new social legislation. Secondly, the administrative mechanisms through which administrators validated indigence status reveal the bureaucratic continuities of interwar period <i>commandement</i>. Using the “quality of indigence,” allowed the administration surveil people who were not present in the administrative records. In the interstices of these often arbitrary decisions, at this time of imperial reconfiguration in the 1950s, claimants navigated these bureaucratic processes, by fashioning and framing their wealth or lack thereof, strategically, to signal their eligibility.

African Economic HistoryVol. 52(2)
Columbia University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.