Hemoglobin-to-Creatinine Ratio Predicts One-Year Adverse Clinical Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Retrospective and Propensity Score Matched Analysis

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Anemia and renal impairment are key predictors of adverse outcomes in acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). The hemoglobin-to-creatinine (Hb/Cr) ratio combines these parameters into a simple index. This study aimed to evaluate its prognostic value at discharge in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). <b>Methods</b>: The primary endpoint was one-year all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints included major bleeding and the composite of all-cause mortality or reinfarction. Optimal Hb/Cr cut-off values were identified using Liu's method. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to assess associations with outcomes. <b>Results</b>: We analyzed 11,236 STEMI patients from the PRAISE registry with available hemoglobin and creatinine values at discharge. The optimal cut-points were 13.68 for mortality and 14.42 for secondary endpoints. Patients were stratified into low (<13.68; 26.5%) and high (≥13.68; 73.5%) Hb/Cr groups. The low Hb/Cr group was older, had more comorbidities, and received less intensive therapy. At one year, low Hb/Cr patients had significantly higher rates of all-cause mortality (8.7% vs. 2.4%), major bleeding (5.0% vs. 2.4%), and the composite outcome (11.5% vs. 4.9%). In the multivariate logistic regression, the Hb/Cr ratio was inversely associated with all outcomes, namely all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-0.96), major bleeding (OR 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94-0.97), and the composite endpoint (OR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91-0.96). The Hb/Cr ratio outperformed hemoglobin and creatinine alone in predicting mortality (AUC 0.684 vs. 0.649 and 0.645; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: The Hb/Cr ratio is independently associated with one-year adverse outcomes in STEMI and may serve as a simple marker of increased vulnerability. Prospective studies are needed to validate its clinical utility.