Remote Sensing of Discharge Ratios at River Channel Bifurcations

Abstract River channel bifurcations are crucial for distributing water and sediment on floodplains and deltas, but estimating discharge ratios between branches remains challenging. Using satellite imagery and in‐situ discharge data, we demonstrate that bifurcate channel widths can estimate discharge ratios at 23 of 27 bifurcations in 11 rivers worldwide, with good accuracy ( R 2 = 0.80) in 26 of 33 measurements. An empirical width‐discharge equation derived from 5,740 United States Geological Survey gauging stations further improves accuracy ( R 2 = 0.82). For best results, branch widths should be measured within one channel width of the bifurcation. The method is ineffective in cases influenced by tributaries, avulsion, or multiple branches. We conclude that channel width is effective for estimating discharge ratios, especially when paired with an empirical width‐discharge equation, potentially enhancing river discharge estimates from the Surface Water and Ocean Topography satellite mission, which currently lacks flow partitioning capabilities for bifurcations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gl114045
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote Sensing of Discharge Ratios at River Channel Bifurcations

Bo Wang, LAURENCE C. SMITH
2 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
2.21
article

Remote Sensing of Discharge Ratios at River Channel Bifurcations

Bo Wang, LAURENCE C. SMITH
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract River channel bifurcations are crucial for distributing water and sediment on floodplains and deltas, but estimating discharge ratios between branches remains challenging. Using satellite imagery and in‐situ discharge data, we demonstrate that bifurcate channel widths can estimate discharge ratios at 23 of 27 bifurcations in 11 rivers worldwide, with good accuracy ( R 2 = 0.80) in 26 of 33 measurements. An empirical width‐discharge equation derived from 5,740 United States Geological Survey gauging stations further improves accuracy ( R 2 = 0.82). For best results, branch widths should be measured within one channel width of the bifurcation. The method is ineffective in cases influenced by tributaries, avulsion, or multiple branches. We conclude that channel width is effective for estimating discharge ratios, especially when paired with an empirical width‐discharge equation, potentially enhancing river discharge estimates from the Surface Water and Ocean Topography satellite mission, which currently lacks flow partitioning capabilities for bifurcations.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(8)
Brown University (US), Saint Louis University (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.