Husband as Head?: Diverse Perspectives on Gendered Marital Hierarchy From Highly Religious Wives and Husbands

Although religious beliefs often connect with gendered hierarchy in social science research, religion also relates to numerous positive marital outcomes, and very few studies have examined religion and gendered hierarchy within intimate relationships. To bridge this divide, our study used a diverse, exemplar sample to explore how highly religious, heterosexual married couples view and navigate the possibility of gendered hierarchy. Interviews from 74 highly religious, highly satisfied couples provided insight into the following themes: (1) potential harm in viewing hierarchy as sacred, (2) the correct view of sacred hierarchy, (3) hierarchy rejected for sacred equal partnership, and (4) holding hierarchy as sacred. Views simultaneously embracing egalitarian and hierarchical ideas indicate some nuance regarding the construct of gendered hierarchy. Data drawn directly from interviews provide detailed support in the paper for each finding. For participants who accepted the principle of gendered hierarchy, devotion to God and belief in sacred roles appeared as partial explanations for that belief. Whether participants accepted gendered hierarchy or rejected it, unity, love, and respect between partners emerged as central to navigating power dynamics in marriage. Implications for clinicians include careful assessment for indications of abuse of power or intimate partner violence, entering the worldview of religious clients, and willingness to respect expectations viewed as sacred.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Family Process
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.70037
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Husband as Head?: Diverse Perspectives on Gendered Marital Hierarchy From Highly Religious Wives and Husbands

Jolyn C. Schraedel, Andrew H. Rose, Loren D. Marks, Jeffrey Dew et al.
Family Process
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
article

Husband as Head?: Diverse Perspectives on Gendered Marital Hierarchy From Highly Religious Wives and Husbands

Jolyn C. Schraedel, Andrew H. Rose, Loren D. Marks, Jeffrey Dew, David C. Dollahite, Adam A. Rogers
article en

Abstract

Although religious beliefs often connect with gendered hierarchy in social science research, religion also relates to numerous positive marital outcomes, and very few studies have examined religion and gendered hierarchy within intimate relationships. To bridge this divide, our study used a diverse, exemplar sample to explore how highly religious, heterosexual married couples view and navigate the possibility of gendered hierarchy. Interviews from 74 highly religious, highly satisfied couples provided insight into the following themes: (1) potential harm in viewing hierarchy as sacred, (2) the correct view of sacred hierarchy, (3) hierarchy rejected for sacred equal partnership, and (4) holding hierarchy as sacred. Views simultaneously embracing egalitarian and hierarchical ideas indicate some nuance regarding the construct of gendered hierarchy. Data drawn directly from interviews provide detailed support in the paper for each finding. For participants who accepted the principle of gendered hierarchy, devotion to God and belief in sacred roles appeared as partial explanations for that belief. Whether participants accepted gendered hierarchy or rejected it, unity, love, and respect between partners emerged as central to navigating power dynamics in marriage. Implications for clinicians include careful assessment for indications of abuse of power or intimate partner violence, entering the worldview of religious clients, and willingness to respect expectations viewed as sacred.

Family ProcessVol. 64(2)
Brigham Young University (US), Texas Tech University (US)
Brigham Young University
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.