台日酷兒慾望書寫比較分析-以李琴峰《獨舞》與松浦理英子《本色女人》為例-

<p>本論文以酷兒論述來比較體現於台日女性文學中酷兒情慾的普遍性、差異性與特殊性，並著眼於酷兒性（queerness）和國族/國家文化錯綜複雜的交織區塊，進而爬梳檢視在台日社會文化脈絡中各種性相的產出以及身分認同政治。主要探討的文本為台日女同性文學指標性作家李琴峰與松浦理英子的之代表作《獨舞》以及《本色女人》。透過文本分析比較，除了可以體現各自文本中酷兒主體對於複數公共想望的差異性外，也可以端倪出作家書寫抵抗策略的不同，進而比較兩國社會文化論述對酷兒於形塑主體時的規範與箝制。</p> <p> </p><p>This paper applies queer theory to explore and compare the universality, differences, and particularities of queer desires embodied in Taiwanese and Japanese women’s literature. It focuses on the intricate intersections of queerness and national/cultural identities, examining the production of various sexualities and identity politics within the socio-cultural contexts of Taiwan and Japan. The primary texts discussed are Li Qinfeng’s Solo Dance and Matsuura Rieko’s Natural Woman. Through textual analysis and comparison, this paper not only highlights the differences in how queer subjects express multiple desires in each text but also reveals the distinct resistance strategies employed respectively by the writers. Furthermore, it compares the normative constraints imposed by the socio-cultural discourses of the two countries that are effectuated on the formation of queer subjectivities.</p> <p> </p>