Comparison of automated three-dimensional volumetry with manual volumetry for graft evaluation before living donor liver transplant - A prospective study

Abstract Background: The aim of the study was to compare the accuracy and efficacy of automated three-dimensional (3D) software-aided computed tomography (CT) volumetry and manual CT volumetry in calculating the graft weight of living-donor livers for liver transplant (LT) with actual graft obtained during surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 27 volunteer donors for LT were evaluated and operated at an LT Center from 2014 to 2017. Triple-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography was done for all the donors and their graft liver volumes were calculated manually and by an automated postprocessing software. The residual liver volume was also calculated automatically with remnant percentage of total volume. Donor hepatectomies were performed as per the standard procedure. Graft volume requirement is assessed preoperatively based on body weight and Graft Recipient Weight Ratio >0.8 of the recipient. The correlation of graft weight calculated by these two methods was done against actual graft weights (AGWs) during surgery to evaluate the exact accuracy and efficacy of these preoperative measurements. Results: The average total liver volume (TLV) by the automated 3D method was 1207.22 cc (range 785–1596 cc), while the average TLV by the manual method was 1286 cc (range 904.7–1590 cc). The mean graft volume calculated by 3D-automated method and manual volumetry was 581.96 cc and 610.70 cc, respectively, while AGW calculated was 562.55 g. The mean difference between graft volume calculated by 3D-automated volumetry method and AGW was 19.40 g, while the mean difference between graft volume calculated by the manual volumetry method and AGW was 48.14 g. Conclusion: Manual volumetry and 3D-automated volumetry methods were both efficient and precise in measuring and predicting the graft volumes (TLV, standard liver volume, and future liver remnant) in living donor LT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_20_24
Primary Topic
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of automated three-dimensional volumetry with manual volumetry for graft evaluation before living donor liver transplant - A prospective study

Dronacharya Routh, Sanjay Sharma, Pankaj P. Rao, Priya Ranjan et al.
Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
article

Comparison of automated three-dimensional volumetry with manual volumetry for graft evaluation before living donor liver transplant - A prospective study

Dronacharya Routh, Sanjay Sharma, Pankaj P. Rao, Priya Ranjan, Sween Sheoran
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: The aim of the study was to compare the accuracy and efficacy of automated three-dimensional (3D) software-aided computed tomography (CT) volumetry and manual CT volumetry in calculating the graft weight of living-donor livers for liver transplant (LT) with actual graft obtained during surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 27 volunteer donors for LT were evaluated and operated at an LT Center from 2014 to 2017. Triple-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography was done for all the donors and their graft liver volumes were calculated manually and by an automated postprocessing software. The residual liver volume was also calculated automatically with remnant percentage of total volume. Donor hepatectomies were performed as per the standard procedure. Graft volume requirement is assessed preoperatively based on body weight and Graft Recipient Weight Ratio >0.8 of the recipient. The correlation of graft weight calculated by these two methods was done against actual graft weights (AGWs) during surgery to evaluate the exact accuracy and efficacy of these preoperative measurements. Results: The average total liver volume (TLV) by the automated 3D method was 1207.22 cc (range 785–1596 cc), while the average TLV by the manual method was 1286 cc (range 904.7–1590 cc). The mean graft volume calculated by 3D-automated method and manual volumetry was 581.96 cc and 610.70 cc, respectively, while AGW calculated was 562.55 g. The mean difference between graft volume calculated by 3D-automated volumetry method and AGW was 19.40 g, while the mean difference between graft volume calculated by the manual volumetry method and AGW was 48.14 g. Conclusion: Manual volumetry and 3D-automated volumetry methods were both efficient and precise in measuring and predicting the graft volumes (TLV, standard liver volume, and future liver remnant) in living donor LT.

Journal of Current Research in Scientific MedicineVol. 11(1)
Command Hospital (IN), Army Hospital Research and Referral (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.