Waste Detection on Mobile Devices: Model Performance and Efficiency Comparison

This study evaluates object detection models for mobile deployment by comparing YOLOv11 and EfficientDet-Lite using a waste classification dataset. EfficientDet-Lite0 demonstrated higher speed (13 FPS), YOLOv11n was the most power-efficient (125,000 μAh in 590 seconds), and YOLOv11m achieved the highest accuracy (mAP@50: 0.694). The deployment of these models on an Android application highlights their trade-offs: EfficientDet-Lite0 suits speed-critical tasks, YOLOv11n excels in power-sensitive scenarios, and YOLOv11m and YOLOv11s perform best in accuracy-driven applications. These findings inform the selection of optimal models for efficient and accurate waste sorting in mobile and edge computing environments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.15.1.1052
Primary Topic
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Waste Detection on Mobile Devices: Model Performance and Efficiency Comparison

Eva Urankar
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
article

Waste Detection on Mobile Devices: Model Performance and Efficiency Comparison

Eva Urankar
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates object detection models for mobile deployment by comparing YOLOv11 and EfficientDet-Lite using a waste classification dataset. EfficientDet-Lite0 demonstrated higher speed (13 FPS), YOLOv11n was the most power-efficient (125,000 μAh in 590 seconds), and YOLOv11m achieved the highest accuracy (mAP@50: 0.694). The deployment of these models on an Android application highlights their trade-offs: EfficientDet-Lite0 suits speed-critical tasks, YOLOv11n excels in power-sensitive scenarios, and YOLOv11m and YOLOv11s perform best in accuracy-driven applications. These findings inform the selection of optimal models for efficient and accurate waste sorting in mobile and edge computing environments.

International Journal of Science and Research ArchiveVol. 15(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.